November 29th 2021
Late-stage cancer and poor outcomes for patients may occur as a result of low screening numbers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
42nd Annual CFS: Innovative Cancer Therapy for Tomorrow®
November 13-15, 2024
Register Now!
PER LIVER CANCER TUMOR BOARD: How Do Evolving Data for Immune-Based Strategies in Resectable and Unresectable ...
November 16, 2024
Register Now!
Community Practice Connections™: Clinical Updates from Chicago – A Focus on What Community Centers Need to Know to Move Their Solid Tumors' Practices Forward
View More
Medical Crossfire®: How Do Clinicians Integrate the Latest Evidence in Treating Ovarian Cancer to Personalize Care?
View More
Medical Crossfire®: How Does Recent Evidence on PARP Inhibitors and Combinations Inform Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer Now and In the Future?
View More
Community Practice Connections™: 5th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board
View More
Tumor Agnostic Trials and the Reshaping of Precision Medicine in Oncology: A Focus on TSC1/2 Mutations
View More
Community Practice Connections™: Optimize the Diagnosis and Treatment of HER2-Positive Colorectal Cancer
View More
Community Oncology Connections™: Controversies and Conversations About HER2-Expressing Breast Cancer… Advances in Management from HER2-Low to Positive Disease
View More
Annual Hematology Meeting: Preceding the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition
December 6, 2024
Register Now!
How CEACAM5 Expression Can Be Measured and Leveraged in NSCLC Care: Current Developments & Future Therapeutic Opportunities
View More
Medical Crossfire®: Where Are We in the World of ADCs? From HER2 to CEACAM5, TROP2, HER3, CDH6, B7H3, c-MET and Beyond!
View More
Community Oncology Connections™: Overcoming Barriers to Testing, Trial Access, and Equitable Care in Cancer
View More
Translating New Evidence into Treatment Algorithms from Frontline to R/R Multiple Myeloma: How the Experts Think & Treat
View More
Medical Crossfire: How Has Iron Supplementation Altered Treatment Planning for Patients with Cancer-Related Anemia?
View More
Show Me the Data: How Do We Navigate the Latest Evidence on Novel Therapies, Combinations, and Clinical Trials Across MPN Care in the Context of Current Treatment Algorithms?
View More
Towards Personalized Treatment Approaches in Soft Tissue Sarcomas
View More
22nd Annual Winter Lung Cancer Conference®
January 31, 2025 - February 2, 2025
Register Now!
Dialogues With the Surgeon on Integration of Systemic Therapies in Perioperative Settings for NSCLC: Looking at EGFR, ALK, IO, and Beyond…
View More
The Next Wave in Biliary Tract Cancers: Leveraging Immunogenicity to Optimize Patient Outcomes in an Evolving Treatment Landscape
View More
42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference®
March 6 - 9, 2025
Register Now!
The Evolving Tool Box in Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: What You Need to Know About Next-Generation SERDs, PI3K/AKT, ADCs, CDK4/6 and Beyond…
View More
Medical Crossfire®: The Experts Bridge Recent Data in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With Real-World Sequencing Questions
View More
18th Annual New York GU Cancers Congress™
March 28-29, 2025
Register Now!
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy Advances Into Melanoma
View More
Community Practice Connections™: Pre-Conference Workshop on Immune Cell-Based Therapy
View More
Coffee Talk™: Navigating the Impact of HER2/3, TROP2, and PARP from Early Stage to Advanced Breast Cancer Care
View More
Community Practice Connections™: 9th Annual School of Gastrointestinal Oncology®
View More
Exploring the Benefits and Risks of AI in Oncology
View More
BURST CME™: Illuminating the Crossroads of Precision Medicine and Targeted Treatment Options in Metastatic CRC
View More
NCCN Now Recommends Breast Cancer Index for Predicting Benefit from Extended Endocrine Therapy
January 20th 2021The Breast Cancer Index assay is the only of its kind to be recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer as being predictive of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy.
MammoScreen AI Tool Improves Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists in Detecting Breast Cancer
December 16th 2020This study demonstrated that the concurrent use of this new artificial intelligence tool alongside mammography improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists in the detection of breast cancer without prolonging their workflow.
Preliminary Results Suggest AB-MR Detects Breast Cancers that 3-D Mammograms May Miss
November 29th 2020This study found that abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts shows an increase in cancer detection over digital breast tomosynthesis screening.
Large Study Casts Doubt on Value of CAD
May 1st 2007Computer software used to help decipher screening mammograms reduces interpretation accuracy, increases the rate of unnecessary biopsies, and offers no clear improvement in the detection of invasive breast cancer, the largest and most comprehensive community-based study of the technology has found.
MRI Finds Contralateral Breast Tumors That Were Missed by Mammography
April 1st 2007Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the contralateral breast in 969 women newly diagnosed with cancer in one breast detected 30 (3.1%) contralateral breast cancers that were missed by mammography and clinical breast exam at the time of diagnosis.
Satellite Allows Digital Mammography Screening for Rural Native Americans
March 1st 2007A mobile mammography unit that links a digital mammography system with a commercial satellite service provides near real-time interpretation of breast imaging scans to Native American women on remote rural reservations
Medicare Fee Poor Proxy in Economic Analyses of Mammography
January 1st 2007A random sampling of 2.3% of the imaging centers that meet Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) certification showed that the national median cash price for a screening mammogram is more than double the price that is reimbursed by Medicare.
Digital Mammography Best for Young Women With Dense Breasts
January 1st 2007New subgroup analyses from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group confirm previous results that digital screening mammography is significantly more accurate than film screening mammography in young women with dense breasts but not in women overall.
Docetaxel and Herceptin Both Show Benefit in FinHer Trial
March 1st 2006Nine weeks of trastuzumab (Herceptin) given concurrently with single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere) or vinorelbine (Navelbine) prior to combination chemotherapy improves survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients, compared with no trastuzumab, with the docetaxel regimen having a slight advantage over vinorelbine.
Digital Mammography More Accurate in Younger Women
October 1st 2005ARLINGTON, Virginia-Data from more than 40,000 women who underwent both digital and film mammography at 33 sites in the US and Canada show that, while the techniques have similar overall diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer screening, digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and pre- or perimenopausal women.
In Fibroglandular, Dense Breasts, MRI Outperforms Mammography in Detecting Multiple, Malignant Foci
December 1st 2004MILAN, Italy-In women with fibroglandular or dense breasts, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography for detection of multiple malignant foci, suggesting that a dynamic MRI examination is warranted before treatment planning in this group of patients, a team of Italian radiologists and surgeons has concluded. Yet in breasts with an almost completely fatty pattern, both techniques had comparable sensitivity, their multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study showed. Further, while MRI achieved a 17% gain in sensitivity over mammography in detection of invasive foci, the two techniques had similar sensitivity in detection of in situ foci, and neither had a strong positive predictive value (PPV), the researchers found.
Multimillion Dollar Costs Predicted in Screening Mammography Litigation
December 1st 2002In just 10 years, the cost of screening mammography litigation in the United States could top $250 million a year, a recent analysis has found. The analysis, presented at this year’s American Roentgen Ray Society meeting in Atlanta, is based on a
Fewer Recalls With Consensus Double Read Mammograms
August 1st 2002ATLANTA-Compared with independent double reading of mammograms, consensus double reading detects slightly more cancers while significantly decreasing recall rates, thereby minimizing the anxiety that women might experience from undergoing a second mammogram, Susan Harvey, MD, said at the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society (abstract 63).
HHS Secretary Supports Mammogram Screening
April 1st 2002WASHINGTON-Amid continuing controversy over the effectiveness of screening mammography for breast cancer, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has extended its recommendations to include women between the ages of 40 and 49, after concluding that the procedure reduces breast cancer deaths.
NCI Reaffirms Guidelines for Mammography Screening
March 1st 2002BETHESDA, Maryland-The scientific conflict about whether mammography saves lives has been reignited by the decision by an independent advisory committee to rescind its support for such screening and to emphasize the uncertainty of the evidence supporting it.
Routine Mammography Screening Increases Except Among Minorities and the Elderly
January 1st 2002The number of women receiving mammograms is higher than ever, according to the results of a study conducted by the Board of Sponsors for National Breast Cancer Awareness Month (NBCAM). The study found that more women are getting
Survey Finds Women Unwilling to Pay for Immediate Mammography Results
November 1st 2001Would you pay an additional fee to get your screening mammography results right after your examination? In a random survey of 120 women, the majority said no. In fact, one-third of the women said they preferred to get their results at a later