“Promising” Approaches May Advance Mantle Cell Lymphoma Therapy

Commentary
Video

Reducing the manufacturing time of CAR T-cell therapy may have a big impact on the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

In a visit to Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Connecticut, CancerNetwork® spoke with Shalin Kothari, MD, about ongoing research initiatives that show promise in improving the care of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

According to Kothari, an assistant professor of Medicine (Hematology) at Yale University, a potentially notable strategy is achieving coinhibition by administering BCL-2 inhibitors with BTK inhibitors, with studies like the phase 3 SYMPATICO trial (NCT03112174) demonstrating an improvement in responses through this combinatorial approach. He also highlighted the promise of drug classes like non-covalent BTK inhibitors, MALT1 inhibitors, and CAR T-cell therapies in MCL. Regarding T-cell therapies, specifically, Kothari emphasized studying how to reduce manufacturing times to help reduce the likelihood of clinical progression among patients.

Transcript:

There are [many] promising approaches. Number 1 would be the combination of adding a BCL-2 inhibitor and combining it with BTK inhibitors; like coinhibition. The trial that studied that [strategy] is the SYMPATICO trial [NCT03112174], where there was improvement in the complete response rate and overall response rate. That’s something that I would consider in the relapsed/refractory setting.

There are many other promising approaches. We can talk about non-covalent BTK inhibitors like pirtobrutinib [Jaypirca]. There are drugs like BTK degraders, which, rather than inhibiting, they degrade the BTK protein. That’s a promising approach. In addition, we have other novel drugs such as MALT1 inhibition or even CAR T-cell therapy. There are 2 CAR T-cell therapies that are already approved. There are many more products being studied, especially to figure out ways to reduce the manufacturing time.

Right now, the current CAR T-cell therapies take around 4 to 5 weeks to manufacture. If the patients are having experiencing significant progression, then that is a long enough time that they can have clinical progression, which could be clinically meaningful within the 4-to-5-week period. Reducing the manufacturing time has a big impact. There is research going on in all directions.

Reference

Wang M, Jurczak W, Trneny M, et al. Ibrutinib plus venetoclax in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (SYMPATICO): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(2):200-213. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00682-X. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(5):e238. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00210-4.

Recent Videos
Ongoing studies in kidney cancer aim to explore determinants of immune-related adverse effects and strategies for mitigating them.
Machine learning-based approaches may play a role in further understanding of how somatic alterations influence responses or resistance to therapy.
Data from a first-in-disease trial assessing a personalized cancer vaccine in RCC require validation at a larger level, according to David Braun, MD, PhD.
It can cause thrombocytopenia and diarrhea, which are generally manageable and not too big a deal.
Related Content