5-Yr Data Confirm Imatinib Efficacy in CML Pts

News
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 15 No 8
Volume 15
Issue 8

A 5-year follow-up of the largest study to evaluate imatinib (Gleevec) in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) continues to show prolonged response to treatment and a steady decline in rate of disease progression with each additional year of treatment.

ATLANTA—A 5-year follow-up of the largest study to evaluate imatinib (Gleevec) in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) continues to show prolonged response to treatment and a steady decline in rate of disease progression with each additional year of treatment. Brian J. Druker, MD, of the Oregon Health & Science University Cancer Institute, Portland, reported the update at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 42nd Annual Meeting on behalf of IRIS (International Randomized Study of Interferon versus STI571) (abstract 6506).

"Our hope is that patients can stay on this drug for an indefinite period of time. While imatinib does not completely eradicate the presence of disease, we're gaining confidence that patients will continue to do well and that their futures are quite hopeful," Dr. Druker said.

The phase III IRIS trial involved 1,106 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic-phase CML who had received no previous chemotherapy and who were enrolled within 6 months of diagnosis. Patients were randomized to receive either imatinib (400 mg/d) or interferon (IFN) plus cytarabine (ara-C). With a median follow-up of 60 months, 69% of patients remain on first-line imatinib, and 3% remain on first-line IFN/ara-C. "Because so few patients remain on IFN, this has become a long-term follow-up study of imatinib," he said. With 5 years of follow-up, the estimated complete cytogenetic response rate (CCyR, defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases) is 87%, and the complete hematologic response rate is 98% (see Table).

At 5 years, estimated overall survival on first-line imatinib is 95.4% for CML-related deaths and 89.4% for all-cause mortality. The annual rate of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis was 1.5% after 1 year of imatinib, 2.8% after 2 years, 1.6% after 3 years, 0.9% after 4 years, and 0.6% after 5 years, for a total 5-year progression rate of 7.4%. "With prior regimens, progression occurred at an average time of 3 to 3.5 years. Here we are at 5 years, and only 7.4% of patients have progressed. There appears to be a strong trend toward decreasing risk of relapse over time on treatment," he said. "Also, the better the response at 12 months, the lower the risk of relapse. Patients with CCyR at 1 year have only a 3% risk of relapse at 5 years."

No new toxicities were observed in the 5-year follow-up. Only a small percentage of patients discontinued imatinib due to adverse events, and Dr. Druker said that the occurrence of adverse events has decreased over time.

"Late responses to imatinib occur, and responses are durable," Dr. Druker said. "Annual risk of progression is decreasing over time. The 89% overall survival at 5 years exceeds that of all other CML therapies, and less than 5% of the deaths were related to CML. This study confirms imatinib as the standard first-line therapy for all CML patients."

Recent Videos
Although a greater risk of CNS relapse may emerge with immunotherapy-based backbones, toxicities associated with chemotherapy are avoided.
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Related Content