68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Acts as Biomarker for FAP-Positive Cancers

Fact checked by" Russ Conroy
News
Article

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET’s SUVpeak was highest in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer, sarcoma, lung cancer, and esophageal/gastrointestinal cancer.

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET’s SUVpeak was highest in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer, sarcoma, lung cancer, and esophageal/gastrointestinal cancer.

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET’s SUVpeak was highest in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer, sarcoma, lung cancer, and esophageal/gastrointestinal cancer.

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET met the primary end point of positive predictive value (PPV) in the detection of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)–expressing cancer in patients with various tumor types, according to data from a single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT05160051) shared at the 2025 Society of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging Annual Meeting.

On a per-patient basis, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET analysis for the detection of immunohistochemical FAP-positive tumors revealed that, of 114 patients who were PET positive, 103 patients were immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive and 11 were IHC negative; of 13 patients who were PET negative, 9 were IHC positive and 4 were IHC negative. The PPV was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), and the standard error (SE) was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96).

On a per-region basis, of 109 patients who were PET positive, 100 were IHC positive and 9 were IHC negative; of 18 patients who were PET negative, 12 were IHC positive and 6 were IHC negative. The PPV was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96), and the SE was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94). The study investigators added that, for the question of PPV, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET was a biomarker for FAP expression.

In a region-based analysis for local, lymph node, visceral, and bone, when a simplified visual FAP scale was applied for FAP expression, the highest standardized uptake value (SUV)peak correlated with the corresponding FAP expression score (r = .33; P <.001).

Two examples were provided: a patient with lymphoma had 10% or less of cells that were FAP positive and an SUVpeak of 3.4, and another patient with sarcoma had greater than 50% of cells that were FAP positive and an SUVpeak of 15.7.

A tumor uptake analysis showed an overall SUVpeak of 8.4 (± 6.2), and per tumor type, the SUVpeak was5.7 (± 5.5) for genitourinary cancers, 12.2 (± 6.7) for sarcoma, 10.4 (± 3.4) for lung cancers, 5.9 (± 4.7) for hematological cancers, 12.7 (± 7.1) for pancreaticobiliary cancers, 9.9 (± 4.3) for esophageal/gastrointestinal cancers, and 7.5 (± 6.1) for other cancers.

The inter-reader reproducibility based on 3 independent, blinded nuclear medicine physicians was substantial to almost perfect, as inter-reader agreement was found on a per-patient and per-region basis. The patient score was 0.71 (Fleiss’ kappa, 0.62-0.80), and by region, the scores were 0.82 (Fleiss’ kappa, 0.73-0.91) for primary tumor, 0.83 (Fleiss’ kappa, 0.73-0.92) for lymph nodes, 0.72 (Fleiss’ kappa, 0.63-0.81) for visceral metastases, and 0.72 (Fleiss’ kappa, 0.63-0.81) for osseous metastases.

“The primary end point was met: PPV of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for the detection of FAP-expressing cancer reached [75% or higher],” wrote presenting study author Kim Pabst, MD, of the Department of Nuclear Medicine of West German Cancer at University Hospital Essen in Essen, Germany, and coauthors, in the presentation. “68Ga-FAPI-46 PET serves as a biomarker for FAP-positive tumors.”

A total of 155 patients received 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in the study. Of them, 146 patients received surgery or biopsy within 8 weeks prior to or after PET/CT, and 9 did not. Of the 146 patients who did, 127 had FAP immunohistochemical analysis performed; 112 were FAP IHC positive, and 15 were FAP IHC negative.

Eligible patients had proven or suspected malignancy at initial staging or restaging, at least 1 detectable tumor lesion with any diameter greater than 1 cm, no prior external beam radiation or systemic tumor therapy within 1 month, and intended or performed biopsy or surgery within 8 weeks of enrollment. The immunohistochemical analysis was done by 1 independent, blinded pathologist.

The trial’s primary end point was the per-region and per-patient PPV for the detection of immunohistochemical FAP-positive tumor lesions as confirmed by histopathology. Secondary end points included sensitivity, SUVpeak, inter-reader reproducibility, and the association between immunohistochemical FAP expression and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET SUVpeak.

The median age of patients was 62 years (range, 20-89), and 63% of patients were male; the purpose of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT was staging at initial diagnosis in 64% and restaging in 36%. The most common tumor types were genitourinary (34%), sarcoma (18%), lung (10%), hematological (8%), pancreaticobiliary (8%), esophageal or gastrointestinal (6%), and other types (17%).

Reference

Pabst K, Bartel T, Sandach P, et al. 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for imaging of FAP-expressing cancer: results from a prospective, single-arm, interventional phase 2 clinical trial. Presented at 2025 SNMMI Annual Meeting; June 21-24, 2025; New Orleans, LA.

Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Related Content