Acalabrutinib Regimen Demonstrates Combinatorial Benefit in MCL

News
Video

Tycel Phillips, MD, questioned how the regimen of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab would compare with taking the drugs separately in mantle cell lymphoma.

Prior to the FDA’s approval of acalabrutinib (Calquence) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Rituxan) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Tycel Phillips, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the BTK inhibitor in the indicated patient population.

According to Phillips, an associate professor in the Division of Lymphoma, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation at City of Hope in Duarte, California, the randomized, double-blind phase 3 ECHO trial (NCT02972840)found that progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data were improved by acalabrutinib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab vs chemotherapy alone when investigators censored for COVID-19 deaths, but that physicians should be wary because there is the possibility that the drug combination made patients’ COVID-19 worse.

Phillips compared the data of the ECHO study to those of the phase 3 SHINE study (NCT01776840), and mentioned that, in SHINE, it was clear that the drugs were more potent when combined vs when they were separated, and that the SHINE study had an increased toxicity profile. Philips said, “You don’t necessarily have the toxicity component with ECHO, but if you compare head-to-head, [the] ECHO [regimen] still probably doesn’t look any better than breaking these drugs apart.”

To conclude, he added that the ECHO regimen will be useful in patients with difficult-to-treat disease, and will likely see wider adoption, specifically, if some of the testing tools available in academic settings make their way into community settings.

Transcript:

You can view it through 2 lenses. In one sense, [the ECHO regimen] did meet its primary endpoint, which was a PFS benefit, and there was a hint that there was some trend toward an OS benefit, especially when they censored for COVID-19 deaths. On the flip side, for those COVID-19 deaths, you can’t rule out some contribution from the combination of the drugs making the infection worse in the patient population. There’s that part of the double-edged sword; [it’s] very similar to [the phase 3 SHINE study (NCT01776840)].

The biggest issue that you will always come across with the ECHO [regimen] and any of these [combination] therapies is: how does it compare if we were to give these medications separately? With these medications, they get bendamustine and rituximab for 6 months, and then they start the acalabrutinib, but they continue acalabrutinib indefinitely, until either disease progression or treatment intolerance.

Historically, how we would treat these patients is we would give them bendamustine, they would get maintenance with rituximab for approximately 2 years, and then at relapse, they would then start a BTK inhibitor. At least with the SHINE data set, it did not appear that that combination was more beneficial than [when the drugs were] sequential; additionally, the increased toxicity in the experimental arms led to the lack of uptake of SHINE.

You don’t necessarily have the toxicity component with ECHO, but if you compare head-to-head, [the] ECHO [regimen] still probably doesn’t look any better than breaking these drugs apart. In a more nuanced setting, you would probably reserve the ECHO regimen, meaning the bendamustine, rituximab, and acalabrutinib, for patients who had a more difficult disease to treat, and [there] probably shouldn’t be a one-stop [treatment] applied to everybody across the board. In certain situations, you probably won’t have access to certain distinguishing tests that will allow you to pick out these higher-risk patients who would benefit vs other patients. In some senses, I can see that this will eventually lead to the wider adoption of this across the board vs what may be the case if some of the testing that we do in academic sites were available to all community sites [where] we treat patients with [MCL].

Reference

FDA approves acalabrutinib with bendamustine and rituximab for previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. January 16, 2024. Accessed January 16, 2024. https://shorturl.at/fTW0O

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content