Adding Carboplatin to Cabazitaxel Improves PFS in Aggressive Variant CRPC

Article

Adding carboplatin to cabazitaxel was safe and associated with improved PFS among men with aggressive variant castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Adding carboplatin to cabazitaxel was safe and associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) among men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and particularly men with aggressive variant prostate carcinoma (AVPC), according to a randomized phase II trial presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 3–7 in Chicago (abstract 5020).

Molecular profiling suggested higher androgen receptor–negative and higher proliferation rates among study participants meeting AVPC clinical criteria, reported senior study author Ana M. Aparicio, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, in a poster presentation.

The study authors hypothesized that carboplatin would benefit men with metastatic CRPC and men identified with AVPC using molecular criteria. A total of 160 men with metastatic CRPC were enrolled in the study between 2013 and 2015, and were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2) with or without carboplatin (AUC, 4) every 21 days. The men were stratified based on clinically defined AVPC.

The researchers also sought to test a candidate molecular signature of AVPC (AVPC-m). They conducted immunohistochemical and gene-sequencing panels with tumor samples obtained from trial participants to determine concordance of the candidate AVPC-m signature with AVPC previously identified using clinical criteria. The candidate AVPC-m signature was defined as two or more alterations in p53, RB1, and/or PTEN.

At a median follow-up of 21.6 months, median PFS in the overall population was 7.4 months in the cabazitaxel + carboplatin group vs 4.59 months in the cabazitaxel-only group (P = .004). A subsequent subgroup analysis showed that carboplatin-associated improvement in median PFS remained statistically significant among men with clinically defined AVPC (5.64 months in the cabazitaxel + carboplatin group vs 3.75 months in the cabazitaxel-only group; P = .012), but not among men with non-AVPC metastatic CRPC (7.8 months vs 5.2 months; P = .09).

Common adverse events included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, and constipation. Three cases of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and seven cases of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in the cabazitaxel + carboplatin group, vs one and no such cases, respectively, in the cabazitaxel-only group.

“Additional analyses are ongoing to test the candidate AVPC-m signature in these samples, as well as the rate of alterations in other pathways (eg, DNA damage repair),” the authors wrote.

The researchers will next conduct a phase III study with overall survival as the primary endpoint.

Recent Videos
Hosts Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss presentations at ESMO 2025 that may impact bladder, kidney, and prostate cancer care.
Mandating additional immunotherapy infusions may help replenish T cells and enhance tumor penetration for solid tumors, including GI malignancies.
A novel cancer database may assist patients determine what clinical trials they are eligible to enroll on and identify the next best steps for treatment.
Receiving information regarding tumor-associated antigens or mutational statuses from biopsies may help treatment selection in GI malignancies.
An easy-to-access database allows one to see a patient’s cancer stage, prior treatment, and survival outcomes in a single place.
Better defining which patients with GI cancers are preferred candidates for adoptive cellular therapies may help optimize outcomes.
A consolidated database may allow providers to access information on a patient’s prior treatments and genetic abnormalities all in 1 place.
A study presented at ASTRO 2025 evaluated the feasibility of using a unified cancer database to consolidate information gathered across 14 institutions.
Related Content