Adding Cetuximab to FOLFIRI Best in RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer

Article

Adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI resulted in improvements in survival and objective response in patients with KRAS codon exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

The phase III CRYSTAL trial demonstrated the adding cetuximab to fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) resulted in significant improvements in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response in patients with KRAS codon exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a post-hoc subgroup analysis published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology showed that there was no positive treatment effect of adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI in patients with tumors carrying other predefined mutations at the RAS loci.

“Reserving such first-line treatment for a RAS wild-type population allows the definition of a subgroup more likely to benefit from the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI,” wrote Eric Van Cutsem, MD, of University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and colleagues. “Molecular testing of tumors for all activating mutations in KRAS and NRAS before considering anti-EGFR therapy is therefore essential in selecting the most effective treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.”

According to the researchers, activating mutations of KRAS at codons other than 12 or 13 have been identified, and studies have shown that these mutations may affect outcomes in patients receiving certain targeted therapies.

For this investigation, Van Cutsem and colleagues used data from the CRYSTAL study to assess if adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI had any effect on patients with mutations at RAS loci other than KRAS codon 12 or 13.

Mutation status was evaluable in 64.6% of the 666 patients in CRYSTAL with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors. Of these patients, 14.7% had other RAS mutations.

A significant treatment benefit was seen with the addition of cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type tumors; however, no cetuximab benefit was found for patients with RAS mutations.

“However, given the relatively small number of patients in this group, no definitive conclusions on the negative predictive value of other RAS mutations can be drawn,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers also pointed out that the absence of any negative effects of adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI in patients with RAS mutations conflict with data from the OPUS and PRIME studies, where worse outcomes were reported with the addition of cetuximab and panitumumab.

“However, our data are in line with findings in the second-line setting, which showed that there was no negative effect of combining panitumumab with FOLFIRI for patients with KRAS exon 2–mutant or other RAS-mutant tumors,” the researchers wrote. “Furthermore, on the basis of the findings from these studies, current clinical guidelines recommend that only patients with RAS wild-type tumors should be treated with cetuximab or panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX chemotherapy.”

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content