Adjuvant Chemo Would Benefit Some Patients With Small Breast Tumors

Article

Nearly one quarter of breast cancer patients with small, node-negative tumors have high-risk genomic characteristics and would likely benefit from chemotherapy, according to results of a new study presented at the 2017 ESMO Congress.

Image © David Litman / shutterstock.com

Image © David Litman / shutterstock.com

Nearly one quarter of breast cancer patients with small, node-negative tumors have high-risk genomic characteristics and would likely benefit from chemotherapy, according to results of a new study (abstract 150O_PR).

“Our results challenge the assumption that all small tumors are less serious and do not need adjuvant chemotherapy,” said Konstantinos Tryfonidis, MD, of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer in Brussels. He presented results of a subgroup analysis of the MINDACT trial at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2017 Congress, held September 8–11 in Madrid.

The study included 826 patients (out of 6,693 in MINDACT) with small (< 1 cm), node-negative tumors (pT1abN0). All women had their genomic risk assessed using the MammaPrint assay, and their clinical risk assessed using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online.

Almost all patients were clinical low risk (99.3%), and most were both clinical and genomic low risk (75.5%). A total of 196 women (23.7%) were clinical low risk but genomic high risk (5 others were clinical high risk and genomic low risk). 

Those deemed low risk by both assessments did not receive chemotherapy, while the few who were high risk by both were advised to receive chemotherapy. The discordant patients were randomized to either receive or not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

The results suggest that these patients, though considered low risk in general, did derive benefit from chemotherapy. The 5-year distant metastasis–free survival rate was 97.3% in those who received chemotherapy, and 91.4% in those who did not. The 5-year overall survival rate was 98.5% with chemotherapy, and 95.8% without it.

Evandro de Azambuja, MD, PhD, of the Jules Bordet Institute in Brussels, commented on the study, and said that this makes it clear that tumor biology, and not just size, is important for breast cancer patients. “Small, node-negative tumors can be very aggressive, even if they are classified as clinical low risk,” he said. “Tumor biology needs to be taken into account when deciding adjuvant treatments in this patient population.”

Recent Videos
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content