Alemtuzumab Over Chlorambucil for Untreated B-Cell CLL

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 15 No 8
Volume 15
Issue 8

Alemtuzumab (Campath) is well tolerated when given as front-line therapy for progressive B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (BCLL) and produces a higher response rate than chlorambucil (Leukeran).

ATLANTA—Alemtuzumab (Campath) is well tolerated when given as front-line therapy for progressive B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (BCLL) and produces a higher response rate than chlorambucil (Leukeran). These were the key interim findings of a phase III trial presented at the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 6511).

Based on phase II trial data, FDA granted accelerated approval for alemtuzumab for the treatment of BCLL in patients who have been treated with alkylating agents and who have had a failure on fludarabine (Fludara) therapy, said Peter Hillmen, MB, ChB, PhD, of Leeds General Infirmary, UK. "Following the approval, there was a postapproval commitment to perform a randomized controlled trial against one of the approved agents," he explained, and chlorambucil was chosen.

A total of 297 patients with untreated progressive BCLL were enrolled in the trial (CAM307) in Europe and the United States, and randomized to alemtuzumab (30 mg IV three times a week for up to 12 weeks) or chlorambucil (40 mg/m

2

PO every 28 days for up to 12 months). Patients in the alemtuzumab arm were given prophylactic therapy to avert Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and herpesvirus infection.

Response Rates

Responses were assessed by bone marrow biopsy according to NCI criteria, Dr. Hillmen said. When responses were assessed by investigators, the overall rate of response (complete plus partial responses) was significantly higher with alemtuzumab than with chlorambucil (77% vs 39%); there was also a significant difference in favor of alemtuzumab in terms of complete responses (31% vs 4%). Similarly, when responses were assessed by an independent response review panel, alemtuzumab was significantly superior to chlorambucil in terms of overall response rate (83% vs 56%) and complete response rate (24% vs 2%).

He noted that the study showed significantly higher overall response rates in patients with certain cytogenetic abnormalities, including those with 13q deletions, a common genetic event in BCLL, and 11q deletions, an abnormality typically associated with poor prognosis.

Further, he said, in patients with a 17p deletion, another marker of poor prognosis, overall response rates were three times higher among patients receiving irinotecan (64% vs 20%), but the number of patients was too small to reach significance.

"We hope that later on this year we will have progression-free survival data when sufficient patients have progressed within the trial," Dr. Hillmen said.

Toxicity

The rate of grade 3-5 infections, excluding cytomegalovirus (CMV), was 16% in the alemtuzumab group and 8% in the chlorambucil group. The proportion of patients who had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia was about 5% and 3%, respectively. During treatment, CMV viremia of any grade occurred in 46% of alemtuzumab-treated patients and 3% of chlorambucil-treated patients, but rates of CMV infection of any grade were considerably lower, at 11% and 0%. "All CMV infections in this study were managed successfully," Dr. Hillmen said. "There were no lasting sequelae due to CMV infections."

The incidence of drug-related serious adverse events was 25% with alemtuzumab and 6% with chlorambucil. Some 14% of patients given alemtuzumab discontinued therapy because of adverse events, compared with roughly 1% of those given chlorambucil.

Recent Videos
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Related Content