Asciminib May Be an “Attractive” Option in Newly Diagnosed CML Populations

Commentary
Video

Ongoing genomic profiling analyses in the ASC4FIRST trial may further determine which patients with CML may benefit from treatment with asciminib.

Asciminib (Scemblix) may be an “attractive” treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who are typically candidates for other therapies such as imatinib (Glivec), according to Timothy P. Hughes, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, FAAHMS.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Hughes, a professor and faculty at the Health and Medical Sciences of The University of Adelaide Medical School in Australia, spoke about patients with newly diagnosed CML who may benefit from treatment with asciminib based on findings from the phase 3 ASC4FIRST trial (NCT04971226). According to Hughes, asciminib may offer improved potency as well as equivalent safety compared with options such as imatinib.

Hughes also highlighted that the next steps for researching asciminib in this population will involve genomic profiling analyses, which may help further determine the types of patients who can benefit most from this treatment.

Transcript:

When you’re [considering asciminib for] a patient for whom you would normally select imatinib, that suggests you’re worried about toxicity. A patient may have comorbidities and frailty. Given this new finding, you can use the asciminib, which is far more potent and has equivalent or better safety [compared with imatinib]. That provides an attractive option for those patients. For the patients where you would select a second-generation drug, we now have a drug that is equally potent but clearly safer, so that becomes a good opportunity there, as well.

One of the things we’re [researching] at the moment is the genomic profile of that diagnosis and whether that can guide our therapy. We’re going to see the results of that profiling from the ASC4FIRST study over the next 6 months. [The results] will tell us a lot more about who’s benefiting the most from asciminib and where we might need to use a different approach. That’s going to be very important.

Reference

Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Takahashi N, et al. ASC4FIRST, a pivotal phase 3 study of asciminib (ASC) vs investigator-selected tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IS TKIs) in newly diagnosed patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): primary results. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA6500. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17suppl.LBA6500

Recent Videos
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
A combined cohort composed of patients from the TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung-05 trials showed a survival advantage with dato-DXd vs docetaxel.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Osimertinib/chemotherapy and amivantamab/lazertinib have exhibited an efficacy advantage vs osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Related Content