Asciminib May Be an “Attractive” Option in Newly Diagnosed CML Populations

Commentary
Video

Ongoing genomic profiling analyses in the ASC4FIRST trial may further determine which patients with CML may benefit from treatment with asciminib.

Asciminib (Scemblix) may be an “attractive” treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who are typically candidates for other therapies such as imatinib (Glivec), according to Timothy P. Hughes, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, FAAHMS.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Hughes, a professor and faculty at the Health and Medical Sciences of The University of Adelaide Medical School in Australia, spoke about patients with newly diagnosed CML who may benefit from treatment with asciminib based on findings from the phase 3 ASC4FIRST trial (NCT04971226). According to Hughes, asciminib may offer improved potency as well as equivalent safety compared with options such as imatinib.

Hughes also highlighted that the next steps for researching asciminib in this population will involve genomic profiling analyses, which may help further determine the types of patients who can benefit most from this treatment.

Transcript:

When you’re [considering asciminib for] a patient for whom you would normally select imatinib, that suggests you’re worried about toxicity. A patient may have comorbidities and frailty. Given this new finding, you can use the asciminib, which is far more potent and has equivalent or better safety [compared with imatinib]. That provides an attractive option for those patients. For the patients where you would select a second-generation drug, we now have a drug that is equally potent but clearly safer, so that becomes a good opportunity there, as well.

One of the things we’re [researching] at the moment is the genomic profile of that diagnosis and whether that can guide our therapy. We’re going to see the results of that profiling from the ASC4FIRST study over the next 6 months. [The results] will tell us a lot more about who’s benefiting the most from asciminib and where we might need to use a different approach. That’s going to be very important.

Reference

Hughes TP, Hochhaus A, Takahashi N, et al. ASC4FIRST, a pivotal phase 3 study of asciminib (ASC) vs investigator-selected tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IS TKIs) in newly diagnosed patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): primary results. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA6500. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17suppl.LBA6500

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content