ASCO Urges Passage of Bill to Guarantee Medicare Coverage of Cancer Clinical Trials

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 5
Volume 13
Issue 5

The American Society of ClinicalOncology recently urged Congress to pass the Medicare Cancer Clinical Trials Coverage

The American Society of ClinicalOncology recently urged Congress to pass the Medicare Cancer Clinical Trials Coverage Act without delay.

The bipartisan bill, reintroduced in the Senate by Senators Connie Mack (R-FL) and Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), would establish a demonstration project to guarantee Medicare beneficiaries coverage of routine patient care costs in cancer clinical trials. Similar legislation has been introduced in the House by Representatives Johnson and Cardin.

“Clinical trials advance both patient care and cancer research,” said John R. Durant, MD, executive vice president of ASCO. “Without them, we would not have new drugs to treat cancer, nor would we be able to provide state-of-the-art care to cancer patients.”

Currently, the Medicare program’s policy regarding clinical trials coverage is confusing and inconsistent, leaving patients in a state of uncertainty and fear about whether necessary care offered in a trial will be reimbursed. Even though federal regulations state that Medicare will cover usual patient care costs provided in research settings, some Medicare carriers deem such care “experimental” and therefore deny coverage. Any denials are disastrous to patients whose best available treatment option is in a clinical trial.

“Only through clinical trials can advances in basic research be translated into improved therapies for individuals with cancer,” said Dr. Durant. “Barriers to participation in peer-reviewed trials, including insurance denials as well as the perceived threat of such denials, must be eliminated.”

Because over one half of all cancers are diagnosed in persons age 65 or older, it is critical that this population be well-represented in cancer research. Unless senior citizens are included in clinical trials, research results cannot take into account the potentially different effects cancer and cancer treatments have on their bodies.

“Denying Medicare beneficiaries access to clinical trials is discriminatory and may call into question the validity of clinical trial results as applied to this age group,” said Dr. Durant.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Related Content