Association of Aspirin Use With Mortality Risk Among Older Adult Patients with Cancer

Article

The use of aspirin 3 or more times a week was associated with a reduction in all-cause, cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and colorectal cancer mortality in adults 65 and over, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.

The use of aspirin 3 or more times a week was associated with a reduction in all-cause, cancer, gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, and colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in adults 65 and over, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.

The cohort study evaluated aspirin use in 146,152 individuals, aged 65 and older from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. The authors found that aspirin use 3 or more times per week showed association with decreased risk of mortality of all causes (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.80-0.83; P  < .001), any cancer (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.88; < .001), GI cancer (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.84; < .001), and CRC (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84; < .001). 

When the data was sorted by body mass index (BMI), individuals with BMI of 20 to 24.9 and aspirin use of 3 or more times per week showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.85; < .001) and any cancer mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.82; < .001). Participants with BMI 25 to 29.9 and aspirin use 3 or more times per week was showed reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79-0.85; < .001), any cancer mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91; < .001), GI cancer mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86; < .001), and CRC mortality (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.85; = .001). 

“Our exploratory analyses investigating the potential associations among aspirin use, BMI, and mortality risk suggest that the efficacy of aspirin as a cancer preventive agent may be associated with BMI. Participants in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial who were underweight (ie, BMI <20) had no observable benefit associated with aspirin use.”

For the 146,152 individuals that were evaluated, the mean age at baseline was 66.3 years. The mean duration from baseline to completion of the standard questionnaire was 9.1 years. A total of 40,419 individuals (27.7%) died during follow-up. Of those 12,421 individuals (30.7%) died of any cancer. 

The authors noted several limitations to the study, most notably that the study was a secondary analysis of a screening trial with self-reported data on aspirin use. As regular aspirin use was not explicitly defined in the baseline questionnaire, differing interpretation by the participants may have affected how they categorized their individual use.

The authors called for further studies examining the association of BMI with the efficacy of aspirin as a preventive agent for cancer in order to further confirm the findings from the study, noting that changing global obesity trends may substantially alter the population-based efficacy of cancer prevention prophylactics.”

Reference:

 

Loomans-Kropp, HA, Pinsky P, Cao Y, Chan AT, Umar A. Association of Aspirin use with Mortality Risk Among Older Adult Participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12): e1916729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16729

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content