Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Atypical CML Distinct From Related Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Disorders

May 7, 2014
By Dave Levitan
News
Article

A rare subtype of disease known as atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) has been shown to be clinically distinct from a related condition known as unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm.

A rare subtype of disease known as atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) has been shown to be clinically distinct from a related condition known as unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN-U). Several clinical and genetic factors seem to differentiate these diseases.

In a 2008 World Health Organization attempt at classifying diseases falling under the MDS/MPN umbrella, aCML was defined by persistent leukocytosis, marked dysgranulopoiesis, and minimal or no monocytosis or basophilia. The presence of BCR-ABL1 or several other genetic rearrangements precludes an aCML diagnosis. For this study, led by Sa A. Wang, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, researchers analyzed patient archives for 134 patients at 7 large medical centers; results were published in the April 24 issue of Blood.

All patients were confirmed to lack BCR-ABL1. Of the full cohort, 65 cases (49%) fulfilled the three main aCML criteria of persistent leukocytosis, “marked” dysgranulopoiesis (the authors used a ≥ 10% granulocytes cutoff, lacking a specific measure in the WHO guidelines), and greater than 10% myeloid precursors. Those cases were assigned a diagnosis of aCML, while the remaining 69 were diagnosed as MDS/MPN-U.

“Notably, substantial overlapping features between MDS/MPN-U and aCML were observed,” the authors wrote. About 31% of the cohort fulfilled two of the three of those main criteria. Also, though the other WHO criterion of “no basophilia (often ≤ 2% basophils)” was not used for exclusion, the cases that were defined as aCML had a median basophil percentage of 0% and only two patients had greater than 2% basophils.

The researchers found a number of clinical and histological differences between the two groups of patients. Compared with MDS/MPN-U patients, aCML patients had “more frequently increased LDH, organomegaly, worse anemia, thrombocytopenia, higher circulating blasts, and a lower basophil percentage.” The median white blood cell count was significantly higher for aCML patients, at 40.8 × 109 vs 19.4 × 109 (P < .0001).

Treatments given to the two groups were similar. Those with aCML had a median overall survival of 12.4 months and an acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival of 11.2 months; both were significantly worse than with the MDS/MPN-U patients, who had an overall survival of 21.8 months and an AML-free survival of 18.9 months (P = .004 and .003, respectively).

Genotyping showed some differences that did not reach significance, including slightly more mutated RAS with aCML (35% vs 14%), and less JAK2p.V617F (7% vs 19%).

“In summary, we showed that the WHO definition for aCML identifies within the MDS/MPN category a distinct subgroup of patients with a number of adverse clinical features as well as inferior outcomes,” the authors concluded.

Recent Videos
It may be critical to sequence BCL-2 inhibitors with BTK inhibitors for patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the relapsed/refractory setting.
Reducing the manufacturing time of CAR T-cell therapy may have a big impact on the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
It can cause thrombocytopenia and diarrhea, which are generally manageable and not too big a deal.
The medical characteristics of a patient may heavily factor into the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibition for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Related Content
Advertisement

Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 36.1% of patients, with 22.2% being grade 1 and 13.9% being grade 2.

Is There Space for Single-Agent Mosunetuzumab in Frontline MZL Care?

Tim Cortese
September 22nd 2025
Article

Results from the phase 2 MorningSun trial demonstrated that outpatient, subcutaneous single-agent mosunetuzumab was efficacious in patients with marginal zone lymphoma.


Experts detailed key advances in myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma at the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting.

Unraveling Key Blood Cancer Takeaways From the 2025 SOHO Meeting

Francesca Palandri, MD, PhD;Sundar Jagannath, MD;Adam J. Olszewski, MD
September 15th 2025
Podcast

Experts detailed key advances in myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma at the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting.


The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 12th 2025
Article

Lorenzo Falchi, MD, highlighted the most important considerations when using novel immunotherapy combination therapies for patients with indolent lymphoma.


A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
August 11th 2025
Podcast

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.


Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Ziftomenib yielded a median overall survival of 16.4 months in responders with NPM1-mutant AML who received ziftomenib in the phase 1b/2 KOMET-001 trial.


The complete response (CR) rate was 51.4% with M-Pola vs 24.3% with R-GemOx, respectively.

What Makes M-Pola Superior to R-GemOx in Transplant-Ineligible LBCL?

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Results from the SUNMO trial showed that mosunetuzumab plus polatuzumab vedotin achieved a complete response rate of 51.4% in this LBCL population.

Related Content
Advertisement

Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 36.1% of patients, with 22.2% being grade 1 and 13.9% being grade 2.

Is There Space for Single-Agent Mosunetuzumab in Frontline MZL Care?

Tim Cortese
September 22nd 2025
Article

Results from the phase 2 MorningSun trial demonstrated that outpatient, subcutaneous single-agent mosunetuzumab was efficacious in patients with marginal zone lymphoma.


Experts detailed key advances in myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma at the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting.

Unraveling Key Blood Cancer Takeaways From the 2025 SOHO Meeting

Francesca Palandri, MD, PhD;Sundar Jagannath, MD;Adam J. Olszewski, MD
September 15th 2025
Podcast

Experts detailed key advances in myelofibrosis, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma at the Society of Hematologic Oncology 2025 Annual Meeting.


The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 12th 2025
Article

Lorenzo Falchi, MD, highlighted the most important considerations when using novel immunotherapy combination therapies for patients with indolent lymphoma.


A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
August 11th 2025
Podcast

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.


Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Ziftomenib yielded a median overall survival of 16.4 months in responders with NPM1-mutant AML who received ziftomenib in the phase 1b/2 KOMET-001 trial.


The complete response (CR) rate was 51.4% with M-Pola vs 24.3% with R-GemOx, respectively.

What Makes M-Pola Superior to R-GemOx in Transplant-Ineligible LBCL?

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Results from the SUNMO trial showed that mosunetuzumab plus polatuzumab vedotin achieved a complete response rate of 51.4% in this LBCL population.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.