Azenosertib Monotherapy Yields Encouraging Responses in Cyclin E1+ PROC

Fact checked by" Russ Conroy
News
Article

Results from the ZN-c3-001, MAMMOTH, and DENALI trials demonstrated meaningful ORRs with azenosertib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Results from the ZN-c3-001, MAMMOTH, and DENALI trials demonstrated meaningful ORRs with azenosertib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Results from the ZN-c3-001, MAMMOTH, and DENALI trials demonstrated meaningful ORRs with azenosertib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Positive updated results for azenosertib monotherapy in patients with Cyclin E1–positive, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) from the ZN-c3-001 (NCT04158336), MAMMOTH (NCT05198804), and DENALI (NCT05128825) trials have been released, according to a press release from the developer, Zentalis.1 Additional results from the combination cohorts of MAMMOTH trial were also disclosed.

Results from the trials were shared in a virtual corporate event.2

“We are very pleased with the azenosertib results obtained to date and believe we have a clear path to advancing this product candidate to patients,” Julie Eastland, chief executive officer at Zentalis, stated in the press release.1 “Notably, approximately 50% of patients with PROC [have Cyclin E1–positive disease], and we believe that the therapeutic and commercial opportunity in this population, which tends to be especially treatment-refractory, is substantial.”

The ZN-c3-001 Trial

Azenosertib monotherapy given intermittently elicited an overall response rate (ORR) of 20.7% (95% CI, 11.2%-33.4%) in all patients with PROC and 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with Cyclin E1–positive PROC; median duration of response (DOR) was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.9) and 5.2 months (95% CI, 2.8-6.9), respectively. For patients given azenosertib continuously, the ORR was 18.8% (95% CI, 2.3%-51.8%) in all patients with PROC and 33.3% (95% CI, 0.8%-90.6%) in patients with Cyclin E1–positive PROC; median DOR was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.2-not evaluable [NE]) and 4.2 months (95% CI, NE-NE), respectively.

The trial enrolled 274 patients across all tumor types and dosages, 193 of whom received 300 mg or more of azenosertib and were evaluated for safety and anti-tumor activity. Patients were required to have PROC, solid tumors, or uterine serous carcinoma; at least 1 prior line of therapy; and tissue collected for biomarker analysis.

Patients either received azenosertib continuously at 300 mg, 350 mg, 400 mg, or 450 mg, or intermittently in a 5:2 or 4:3 schedule at 350 mg once a day and 175 mg twice a day, 400 mg, 450 mg, or 500 mg.

The median age in the PROC cohort (n = 69) was 66 years (range, 48-83); 72% had an ECOG performance status of 1; the median number of prior lines of treatment was 5 (range, 1-19), with the most common 4 or more (68%). The most common prior therapies were VEGF inhibitors (87%), PARP inhibitors (67%), and PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (17%); and 38% of patients had Cyclin E1–positive status.

Across all tumor types evaluated, the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were nausea (60.6%), fatigue (58.5%), diarrhea (51.8%), and anemia (30.1%); of grade 3 or higher, the most common TRAEs were fatigue (13.5%), neutropenia (13.0%), anemia (11.4%), and thrombocytopenia (10.9%). TRAEs led to dose reduction in 39.4%, dose interruption in 40.4%, treatment discontinuation in 5.2%, and death in 0.5%.

The MAMMOTH Trial

Patients who received 300 mg of azenosertib monotherapy (n = 25) achieved an ORR of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8%-40.7%) in all patients with PROC and 21.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-50.8%) in those with Cyclin E1–positive PROC; the median DOR was 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-NE) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.0-NE), respectively. In those who received 400 mg of azenosertib (n = 36), all patients with PROC had an ORR of 22.2% (95% CI, 10.1%-39.2%) vs 31.3% (95% CI, 11.0%-58.7%) in patients with Cyclin E1–positive PROC; median DOR was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.7-NE) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-NE). Both dosages were administered on a 5:2 schedule.

A total of 117 patients who had received between 1 and 5 prior lines of therapy, were platinum resistant and progressed while receiving a PARP inhibitor, and had sufficient tissue for biomarker analysis were enrolled. The azenosertib monotherapy arm of the trial had a total of 61 patients, and the end points were ORR, DOR, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety and tolerability.

The median age of patients who received 300 mg was 71.0 years (range, 45-80) and 63.0 years (range, 31-84) for patients who received 400 mg; 72% and 56%, respectively, had an ECOG performance status of 1; 60% and 56% received 1 to 3 prior therapies; 100% and 100% received PARP inhibitors; 96% and 94% received bevacizumab (Avastin); and 52% and 44% had Cyclin E1–positive disease.

The most common TRAEs of any grade in the 300 mg and 400 mg cohorts were nausea (60.0% and 52.8%, respectively), diarrhea (52.0% and 47.2%), anemia (40.0% and 38.9%), and thrombocytopenia (32.0% and 36.1%). Of grade 3 or higher, they were anemia (12.0% and 16.7%), neutropenia (12.0% and 13.9%), thrombocytopenia (8.0% and 11.1%), and diarrhea (0% and 11.1%). TRAEs led to dose reduction in 44.0% and 41.7% of patients, respectively, dose interruption in 44.0% and 38.9%, treatment discontinuation in 16.0% and 5.6%, and death in 0.0% and 2.8%.

The DENALI Trial

In the overall trial population, azenosertib monotherapy yielded an ORR of 19.4% (95% CI, 11.9%-28.9%) in response evaluable patients and 17.6% (95% CI, 10.8%-26.5%) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Response evaluable patients who had Cyclin E1–positive disease experienced an ORR of 34.9% (95% CI, 21.0%-50.9%) and 31.3% (95% CI, 18.7%-46.3%) for patients in the ITT population. Those with non-Cyclin E1 immunohistochemistry–positive status had an ORR of 6.0% (95% CI, 1.3%-16.6%) in the response evaluable population and 5.6% (95% CI, 1.2%-15.4%) in the ITT population.

In patients with Cyclin E1–positive disease, the median DOR was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.7-NE), and median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-6.8).

A total of 102 patients with PROC who received 1 to 5 prior lines of therapy and had tissue for biomarker assessment were administered 400 mg of azenosertib monotherapy on a 5:2 schedule in part 1b of the DENALI trial. Trial end points were ORR, DOR, PFS, and safety and tolerability.

The median age of patients was 66 years (range, 34-82), 52% of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0, the most common number of prior therapies was 3 (31%), 91% had prior treatment with bevacizumab, 57% received a prior PARP inhibitor, and 47% had Cyclin E1–positive disease.

The most common TRAEs of any grade were nausea (65.7%), fatigue (59.8%), diarrhea (50.0%), thrombocytopenia (34.3%), and anemia (30.4%). Of grade 3 or higher, the most common were fatigue (15.7%), thrombocytopenia (11.8%), neutropenia (10.8%), anemia (10.8%), and diarrhea (6.9%). TRAEs led to dose reduction in 42.2% of patients, dose interruption in 58.8%, treatment discontinuation in 21.6%, and death in 2.0%.

References

  1. Zentalis Pharmaceuticals shares updated clinical data demonstrating meaningful azenosertib activity in cyclin E1+, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. News release. Zentalis Pharmaceuticals. January 29, 2025. Accessed January 29, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2fjvu5rv
  2. Corporate Event. Zentalis. January 29, 2025. Accessed January 29, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/3scayxrn
Recent Videos
Oncologists are still working on management strategies for neuropathy; a common adverse effect related to chemotherapeutics for ovarian cancer.
Genetic testing information can be used to risk-stratify ovarian cancer survivors for breast cancer, particularly those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Genetic testing for ovarian cancer may help inform treatment decisions for patients with advanced disease, particularly regarding PARP inhibitor use.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.