Is Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Dead?

Article

In this interview we discuss chemoprevention in breast cancer, including investigational agents and the use of herbal supplements.

Banu Arun, MD

Banu Arun, MD, is a professor in the department of breast medical oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. She declared that “chemoprevention is not dead” at the 33rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, held March 10–13 in Miami Beach, Florida.

Cancer Network: In what settings does chemoprevention show the most promise-primary or secondary prevention?

Dr. Arun: Chemoprevention is beneficial in both, primary and secondary prevention. One study, but not all, showed greater benefit for patients with precursor lesions.

Cancer Network: Tamoxifen and raloxifene are the only drugs approved so far by the US Food and Drug Administration for reducing breast cancer risk. How do outcomes for these two drugs compare?

Dr. Arun: None of these agents have shown to have a survival benefit.

Cancer Network: What investigational chemopreventive agents are showing particular promise in breast cancer?

Dr. Arun: Based on preliminary studies, an adjuvant metformin study is ongoing. Results of this study will help us determine whether this agent should move forward, in a large prevention study in high-risk women.

Cancer Network: What roles do biomarkers and gene panels play in primary breast cancer prevention? Secondary prevention?

Dr. Arun: Currently, we have no data related to biomarkers and gene panels in primary and secondary prevention. However, this is being looked at in current studies.

Cancer Network: There have been several clinical trials but few meta-analyses of breast cancer chemoprevention. Why is that?

Dr. Arun: Eligibility is different for studies-hence, it is very difficult to do a meta-analysis.

Cancer Network: There have been repeated reports suggesting widespread self-“prescribing” of herbal supplements as secondary chemopreventive strategies by patients. What are your thoughts about that?

Dr. Arun: Good question. Certain herbal agents have been studied and showed promising results in the preclinical setting and also in phase I studies looking at either biomarker changes or changes in precancerous lesions-for example, curcumin. Future prospective trials are needed to establish the benefit and safety of these agents.

Recent Videos
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Related Content