Caron A. Jacobson, MD, on What Patients Should Know About the Phase 2 ZUMA-5 Study

Video

The expert in hematology discussed what patients should know about the study, which evaluated the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Caron A. Jacobson, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, explained the possible benefits of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Results from the interim analysis of the phase 2 ZUMA-5 study, presented at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Virtual Scientific Program, suggested that axi-cel demonstrated significant and durable clinical benefit in this patient population.

Though this particular study requires further follow-up, the investigators suggested that axi-cel may be a promising therapeutic approach for this patient population.

Transcription:

So, I would say that this is a one-time therapy that has a very, very high response rate, meaning that patients’ disease gets better after the single infusion of these CAR T-cells, with over 80% of patients actually entering remission and, we need more time to follow these patients, but with the, you know, with follow up now out to 15.3 months, a lot of these remissions seem to be durable and lasting. And that that, you know, that we hope that that translates into people living longer and even potentially being cured of their disease. And on the flip side of that, we worry about safety. Obviously, whenever we're testing a new therapy and the safety profile appears to be manageable and reversible and self-limited… So, you know, it's a win-win.

Recent Videos
CAR T-cell therapy initially developed for mantle cell lymphoma was subsequently assessed in marginal zone lymphoma.
The efficacy of the BOVen regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia facilitated its evaluation in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
A paucity of prospective, well-vetted data to guide therapy in patients with rare lymphomas may result in a reliance on expert consensus guidelines.
5 experts in this video
5 experts in this video
Related Content