Chemo Benefit Unclear in Breast Cancer Patients With Higher Recurrence Scores

Article

In patients with breast cancer with a recurrence score based on a 21-gene expression assay of 11 to 25, outcomes were similar whether chemotherapy was used or not.

In patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, lymph node–negative breast cancer with a recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene expression assay of 11 to 25, outcomes were similar whether chemotherapy was used or not used, according to a retrospective analysis. However, the study’s limited follow-up means a benefit from chemotherapy in these patients cannot be ruled out.

The Oncotype DX 21-gene expression assay is the most commonly used test of this kind in breast cancer in the United States. It offers an RS, and previous research has shown that patients with an RS below 11 fare very well when treated with endocrine therapy alone. “To our knowledge, it is unknown whether chemotherapy provides any additional benefit in outcomes in patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, lymph node–negative, early-stage breast cancer with an RS of 11 to 25 who are treated with endocrine therapy,” wrote study authors led by Carlos H. Barcenas, MD, MSc, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

This study included 1,424 patients who underwent the gene expression assay. Among these patients, 297 had an RS of 0 to 10 (21%), 894 had an RS of 11 to 25 (63%), and 233 had an RS of > 25 (16%). In each of these subgroups, 1.7%, 15%, and 73.4%, respectively, received chemotherapy. Results of the study were published in Cancer.

A total of 549 women who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2011 with an RS of 11 to 25 were categorized by receipt of chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months, there were 41 “outcome events,” including 10 distant recurrences, 3 local recurrences, 7 deaths, 11 second primary breast cancers, and 10 primary cancers at other sites.

There were no differences between patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy in any of the following four outcome measures. The hazard ratio (HR) for chemotherapy’s effect on invasive disease–free survival was 1.64 (95% CI, 0.73–3.71; P = .233). For recurrence-free survival, the HR was 1.46 (95% CI, 0.41–5.23; P = .564), and for distant recurrence–free survival it was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.32–4.92; P = .746). For overall survival, the HR was 2.19 (95% CI, 0.44–11.0; P = .340).

The authors noted that the results are limited by the low overall number of events, as well as the relatively short follow-up period. “A benefit from chemotherapy in this group cannot be ruled out because a longer follow-up is required to observe future events,” they concluded.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content