Combination Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab for Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 15 No 3
Volume 15
Issue 3

Treatment options for patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are limited. In this report, we present our preliminary results of a biochemotherapy combination using rituximab (Rituxan, a monoclonal antibody against CD20) with

Treatment options for patients with relapsed chronic lymphocyticleukemia (CLL) are limited. In this report, we present our preliminary resultsof a biochemotherapy combination using rituximab (Rituxan, a monoclonal antibodyagainst CD20) with fludarabine (Fludara) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar).During course 1, rituximab is given at a slow rate at 375 mg/m2 on day 1followed by fludarabine at 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m2 on days 2-4.During subsequent courses (2-6), rituximab is given at 500 mg/m2 on day 1 andfludarabine and cyclophosphamide are given at the same doses but on days 1-3.Of 84 patients registered, 43 are currently evaluable after more than 3 courses.

Patients had a median age of 57 years (range: 18 to 74 years),65.1% were male, and 44% were Rai stage IV. The median platelet count was 110(range: 15 to 367), median hemoglobin was 12.2 (range: 6.8 to 16.0), and medianwhite blood cell count was 45.8 (range: 2.7 to 311). Three or more lymph nodesites were involved in 58%, B2 microglobulin was greater than 3 in 79%, and 83%had a performance status of 1 or less. Of the 43 patients, 1 had spleniclymphoma with villous lymphocytes and 1 had marginal zone lymphoma. The mediannumber of prior treatments was 3: 9.3% of patients had received alkylatingagents only, 65.1% had been sensitive to fludarabine-containing regimens, and20.9% had been resistant to fludarabine. The median follow-up time is 5 months.

Using National Cancer Institute criteria, the complete remission(CR) rate is 14% (all in the fludarabine-sensitive group, 21%), nodular partialresponse (PR) 14%, PR 42%, stabilization of disease 4.7%, and no response 20.9%.Total response rate is 69.9%. One patient died early. Five other patients havedied (none during the first course), 3 of them due to progression of disease.Serious toxicities from the treatment include 8 episodes of pneumonia, 4episodes of neutropenic fever, 2 of sepsis, and 1 prolonged myelosupression.Other frequent toxicities related to rituximab include fever, chills, andnausea; hypotension occurred in 5 (12%) patients.

CONCLUSION: In summary, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, andrituximab is a very active and well-tolerated program for patients withpreviously treated CLL, in particular for fludarabine-sensitive disease. Studiesevaluating the efficacy and toxicity of this program are ongoing.

Click here to read Dr. Bruce Cheson's commentary on this abstract.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
No evidence indicates synergistic toxicity when combining radiation with CAR T-cell therapy in this population, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
The addition of radiotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy may particularly benefit patients with localized disease, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD, discusses how radiation may play a role as bridging therapy to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
Related Content