Commentary on Abstracts #3153, #3592, #3168, #3170, #704, #2214, #3275, #1086, #2560, and #3264

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 15 No 2
Volume 15
Issue 2

Rituximab is also being explored in other lymphoid malignancies. Some of the most interesting data are in patients with CD20-positive Hodgkin’s disease (abstract #3153). The Stanford group (abstract #3592) reported on 13 patients. Of the 9

Rituximab is also being explored in other lymphoid malignancies. Some of the most interesting data are in patients with CD20-positive Hodgkin’s disease (abstract #3153). The Stanford group (abstract #3592) reported on 13 patients. Of the 9 who were assessable for response, there were 6 CRs and 3 PRs with a single relapse at 6 months. The German Hodgkin’s group reported on 6 patients, all of whom had failed at least one prior treatment regimen. Of the 5 with lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin’s disease, there were 4 CRs and 1 PR; the patient with classical Hodgkin’s disease also attained a CR. Lower response rates appear to be achievable in patients with classical Hodgkin’s disease (abstract #3168), with 1 CR and 2 PRs in 18 patients with nodular sclerosis histology, 13 of whom had progressed after stem cell transplantation. Clearly, this agent should be studied as part of a multidrug regimen in the treatment of this disease.

Coiffier et al (Blood 92:1927-1932, 1998) have previously demonstrated activity for rituximab in patients with mantle cell lymphoma, although responses were brief without further therapy. Romaguera et al (abstract #3170) added the antibody to their effective hyper CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], dexamethasone) regimen (Khouri et al: J Clin Oncol 16:3803-3809, 1998) and presented their data from an ongoing trial in 43 patients. The CR rate was 90%, but longer follow-up is needed to assess the durability of responses in this population. Treon et al (abstract #704) treated 19 multiple myeloma patients whose bone marrow cells were CD20 positive, with a single partial response.

Using the standard dose and schedule of administration, rituximab has exhibited relatively limited single-agent activity in small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Piro et al: Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:14a[abstract #49], 1999; Nguyen et al: Eur J Haematol 62:76-82, 1999; Maloney et al: Blood 90:2188-2195, 1997). Nevertheless, in vitro and early clinical data suggest the potential for the antibody to sensitize lymphoma cells to the effects of chemotherapy. As a result, rituximab is being incorporated into multiagent regimens with promising results.

Keating et al (abstract #2214) built on their prior institutional experience using the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (O’Brien et al: Int J Hematol 64:S56[abstract #214], 1996) by adding rituximab. Of the 35 patients evaluable after six courses, there were 57% CRs and a response rate of 94%; for those who had completed only three courses, responses occurred in 81%, with 14% CRs. Major infections were uncommon (3%), with no opportunistic organisms. Impressive data were also reported for patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia using this same regimen (abstract #3275).

Based on its B-cell-depleting properties, rituximab as a single agent or in combination with immunosuppressive chemotherapy drugs has been used to treat nonmalignant conditions such as immune thrombocytopenic purpura and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (Hegde et al: Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol [in press], 2001; Perrota and Abuel: Blood 92:88b[abstract #3360], 1998; abstracts #1086, #2560, #3264), with encouraging success in many patients who failed conventional therapies.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content