Communication and Education Are Key for CAR T-Cell Therapy in LBCL

Commentary
Video

Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

It is important that treating physicians and community oncologists remain in communication to optimally treat patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) using CAR T-cell therapy, according to David L. Porter, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2024 Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Meetings, Porter, the director of Cell Therapy and Transplant at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, discussed addressing various challenges associated with administering CAR T-cell therapy to patients with LBCL.

In a community oncologist roundtable that aimed to form appropriate CAR T-cell therapy consultation strategies for the aforementioned population, Porter and his colleagues captured the essence of their initiative with the slogan “If they RECUR, you should refer”, with the second “R” of RECUR meaning “receive patients returning post–CAR T-cell therapy”.

This portion of the slogan, Porter said, emphasized the necessity of treating physicians and community oncologists being prepared to treat and monitor patients following CAR T-cell therapy. He described how an educational suite at his institution may help oncologists properly manage toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy.

Transcript:

[CAR T-cell therapy] is a very new, highly specialized therapy, and it is important that [patients’] primary caregiver—their primary oncologist, for instance—is familiar with the therapy. They need to be familiar with the therapy that the patient received, the potential toxicities, and how to manage them moving forward after the initial treatment. That requires the treatment center that has the expertise to remain in communication with a patient's primary oncologist.

We think that's going to require a great deal of education and communication that may be different. For different centers, there may be different methods of communication and interaction, but it's critical. The last "R" in our acronym, RECUR, stood for "receive patients returning post–CAR T-cell therapy," highlighting the importance of that treating physician and community oncologists being ready to get the patient back into their practice. But [it's] also [a matter of] acknowledging that the care center has to be in communication with those physicians to help provide education. That can take many forms.

At my center at the University of Pennsylvania, we are developing an educational suite that we hope referring oncologists may take advantage of to learn about the toxicities, both acute and long-term, and how to manage these patients going forward after their treatment. It may be written material, peer-to-peer conversations, or educational meeting opportunities, and this will take many forms. It will be different for different physicians or care practices. We need to not just count on one method but take advantage of all the different methods at our disposal.

Reference

Riedell PA, Downs C, Boehmer L, Ebmeier J, Porter D, Williams A. If They RECUR, you should refer: a community oncologist patient ID roundtable summary. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2024;30(1):14-16. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2023.10.019

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
Related Content