COVID-19 Antibodies Are Similar for Those With Solid Tumors Compared With Those Without 6-Months After the Second Dose

Article

Patients with cancer and those without cancer had similar serologic results 6-months after receiving their second BNT162b2 vaccine.

After 6 months, patients with solid tumors and who received the second dose of Pfizer’s BNT162b2 vaccine (Comiraty) retained similar levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies compared with the general population of patients without cancer, according to a study published by the American Association for Cancer Research.1

In total, 79% of patients (n = 122) who were receiving active treatment for cancer were compared with 84% (n = 114) of those in the control group. There was no significant difference found between groups when comparing age, sex, or disease stage. Among the cancer cohort, treatment with chemotherapy was associated with a seronegative serologic status vs other therapies (27% vs 10%; OR, 0.31; P = .02). Among the population of patients who were seronegative, 81% were actively undergoing chemotherapy. In the population of seropositive individuals, a female predominance was noted in the control cohort compared with the patient group (93% vs 75%; OR, 0.21; P = .004).

“In our study we saw that in all outcomes, including immunogenicity, infectivity rate throughout the 6-month period, and safety, patients with solid tumors depicted a similar trend as the general population,” Irit Ben-Aharon, MD, PhD, director of the Oncology Division at Rambam Healthcare Campus in Israel, said in a press release.2

A total of 154 patients who were undergoing active intravenous treatment for their disease were included in the study, as well as the 135 age-matched health care workers who acted as the control group. The majority of patients with cancer who enrolled on the study were men (55%; n = 84) and the median patient age was 66 years. In the control group, 56% of participants were men (n = 75) and the median age was 63 years.

Patients were tested 166±29 days after the second dose and 187 days from the first dose. In the patient group, 84% (n = 129) had metastatic disease. The most common cancer types among patients who enrolled on the study included gastrointestinal cancer (36%; n = 56), lung cancer (23%; n = 36), breast cancer (17%; n = 26), and genitourinary cancer (11%; n = 18). Most patients had metastatic disease (84%; n = 129). Active cancer therapies included chemotherapy (62%), biological agents (36%), or immunotherapy (30%), although some patients notably received more than 1 class of drug.

Between the 2 cohorts, no significant difference in median absolute serology titer was noted among seropositive individuals. Additionally, both cohorts demonstrated a drastic decline over time in serology titers over 6 months, however, it remained above threshold value. A total of 15% of seropositive patients became seronegative after 6 months, which was comparable with the control group. Patients who achieved seronegativity remained seronegative throughout the study.

Investigators reported 1 documented case of COVID-19 infection following the second dose of the vaccine in the patient cohort, which required hospitalization. Of note, there were no other reported cases of COVID-19 during this study.

Elevation of liver enzyme levels was documented in 10% of patients up to 6-weeks following the first dose. Additionally, 5% of patient had newly documented regional lymphadenopathy that was identified through CT or PET scans that were performed during routine cancer care.

In total, 6% (n = 9) of patients’ anticancer treatment was delayed for 2 weeks after vaccination; all patients within this population were receiving chemotherapy. Additional treatment delays were due to neutropenia (n = 7), mild thrombocytopenia (n =1), and neutropenia with herpes labials (n = 1). In all patients with neutropenia, there was a gradual decline before vaccination, or neutropenia was found in other cycles. All patients had treatment renewed within a week for all patients.

References

1. Waldhorn I, Holland R, Goshen-Lago T, et al. Six month efficacy and toxicity profile of BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients with solid tumors. Cancer Discov. Published online first, September 2, 2021. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1072

2. Six-month efficacy of Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in patients with solid tumors similar to general population. News Release. American Society for Cancer Research. September 2, 2021. Accessed September 2, 2021.

Recent Videos
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Point-of-care manufacturing, scalable manufacturing, and bringing the cost down [can help].
A novel cancer database may assist patients determine what clinical trials they are eligible to enroll on and identify the next best steps for treatment.
A consolidated database may allow providers to access information on a patient’s prior treatments and genetic abnormalities all in 1 place.
A study presented at ASTRO 2025 evaluated the feasibility of using a unified cancer database to consolidate information gathered across 14 institutions.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ESMO Annual Congress, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Physical therapists may play a key role in patient care before, during, and after treatment for cancer, according to Alison Ankiewicz, PT, DPT.
Related Content