Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, Says Maintenance Immunotherapy Has Become Standard Practice in Bladder Cancer

Video

At the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, spoke about how immunotherapy has influenced treatment for patients with bladder cancer.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, professor of medicine (medical oncology) and of urology and co-leader of Cancer Signaling Networks at Yale Cancer Center, about using maintenance immunotherapy as a standard of care for patients with bladder cancer. He spoke on the topic at the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, hosted by Physicians’ Education Resource®, LLC (PER®), for which he served as meeting co-chair.

Transcript:

Immunotherapy is now considered standard of care for patients who respond to frontline chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. By respond, I define that as stable, complete, or partial response to chemotherapy, which could be either cisplatin and gemcitabine, carboplatin and gemcitabine, or the MVAC regimen [which includes methotrexate, vinblastine sulfate, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin]. There’s a significant improvement in survival in those patients who receive maintenance of avelumab [Bavencio] compared with those who receive just best standard of care in that setting. We view that as standard treatment for these patients.

Recent Videos
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Various methods of communication ensure that members from radiation oncology, pathology, and other departments are on the same page regarding treatment.
Comprehensive prehabilitation may help prepare patients for bladder-preserving surgery, helping to optimize quality of life outcomes.
Ongoing research suggests environmental exposures and the role of microbiomes may influence bladder cancer development and response to treatment.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Related Content