Data Favor Twice-Daily vs Once-Daily Chemoradiotherapy in LS-SCLC

Commentary
Video

The clinical adoption of twice-daily accelerated radiotherapy has been limited in North America despite improved outcomes, according to Bin Gui, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2025 American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Bin Gui, MD, spoke about the rationale of a study comparing twice-daily chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with once-daily treatment among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Gui and colleague presented findings from this research in a poster session at the meeting.1

According to Gui, resident physician in the Department of Radiation Medicine at Northwell Health Cancer Institute, prior research demonstrated superior outcomes with twice-daily CRT compared with once-daily therapy, although he noted the limited clinical adoption of the twice-daily schedule based on concerns regarding esophagitis and other logistical challenges. Moreover, he highlighted how findings from the phase 3 ADRIATIC trial (NCT03703297) exhibited the benefit of supplementing CRT with consolidation immunotherapy, inspiring the need to further research how immunotherapy can be combined with radiation in this patient population.2

Findings from the poster presented at ASTRO 2025 showed that twice-daily CRT prolonged 2-year overall survival (OS) by 13% (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21) and produced similar progression-free survival (PFS; RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.90-1.30) vs once-daily CRT. Data supported the conclusion that the addition of immunotherapy appeared to favor twice-daily CRT vs once-daily CRT based on improved survival and fewer hematologic toxicities.

Transcript:

The assessment of twice-daily vs. once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for LS-SCLC stemmed from a need to determine the optimal radiotherapy regimen as the standard of care with concurrent chemoradiotherapy [CCRT] continues to evolve. Earlier studies suggested twice-daily accelerated radiotherapy improved outcomes. However, its clinical adoption has been limited, particularly in North America, due to concerns about esophagitis and logistical challenges. More recently, the ADRIATIC trial [NCT03703297] demonstrated a significant benefit from adding consolidation immunotherapy following CCRT, creating the need to understand how best to integrate this strategy with the CCRT regimen, including the choice of radiotherapy fractionation schedule.

The addition of immunotherapy appears to favor twice-daily over once-daily CCRT for LS-SCLC, with improved survival and reduced lymphocyte depletion.

References

  1. Gui B, Akerman M, Sekari J, Plann-Curley B, Parashar B. Should we return to old school in a new era? A meta-analysis of twice daily vs. once daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Presented at the 2025 American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting; September 27 – October 1, 2025; San Francisco, CA.
  2. Cheng Y, Spigel DR, Cho BC, et al. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(14):1313-1327. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2404873
Recent Videos
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content