Data May Provide “Framework” for Mitigating Cancer Surgery Disparities

Commentary
Video

Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.

Data from a retrospective analysis indicated how residential segregation may contribute to inequalities in cancer mortality for patients who undergo surgery, which may provide a “framework” for future policies designed to mitigate these disparities, said Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.

Waheed, a research fellow in the Department of Surgical Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, spoke with CancerNetwork® about findings presented at the 2024 Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Meeting (SSO) from a study assessing the impact of racial/economic segregation on patient-level accessibility, timeliness, and appropriateness of treatment for cancer.

Although Waheed stated that the presentation highlighted inequities in access to care and mortality across different demographics, he acknowledged that exploring the mechanisms that drive these disparities is another question that must be addressed. Additionally, he said that he would share the results of his study with policymakers in California to help inspire legislature that may improve treatment access and quality for patients in disadvantaged areas.

Transcript:

This study highlights the issues that are on the systemic level and brings forward the impact of very longstanding racist policies. It’ll be hard to do anything each year to address these issues. The study shows the zip codes, areas, and disease sites that are being affected the most, and it sheds [light] on the mechanism that is driving these disparate survivals. That was the biggest question. It’s easier to find this disparate access and mortality, but what are the mechanisms that are driving these differences?

These are important points that we need to focus on. It provides the framework for state- and federal-level policies to prioritize and target these areas, the disease sites, accessibility, and timeliness appropriateness of cancer treatment. These patients residing in disadvantaged areas should have equal access and quality of cancer care. We will share these findings with stakeholders and policymakers in California. They can maybe use this as a guiding principle and make some policies.

Reference

Waheed MT, Sullivan KM, Haye S, et al. Impact of racialized residential segregation on guideline concordant cancer care and survival. Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2024 Annual Meeting; March 20 – 23, 2024; Atlanta, GA; abstract E126.

Recent Videos
At 5 years, 60% of patients who received lorlatinib in the phase 3 CROWN study achieved progression-free survival.
Joseph C. Landolfi, DO, CPE, and Michelle Morrison, MPH, BSHA, RN, discuss how they can use their leadership roles to improve cancer care.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Leadership of a new cancer center as part of JFK University Medical Center discuss how they can support frontline clinicians.
CAR T-cell therapy initially developed for mantle cell lymphoma was subsequently assessed in marginal zone lymphoma.
The efficacy of the BOVen regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia facilitated its evaluation in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Related Content