Data Support ctDNA-Based Adaptive Strategies for EGFR+ Advanced NSCLC

Article

Longitudinal ctDNA assessments may be a relevant tool for making treatment decisions for patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer based on findings from the phase 2 APPLE trial.

Data Support ctDNA-Based Adaptive Strategies for EGFR+ Advanced NSCLC | Image Credit: © appledesign - stock.adobe.com.

“…The APPLE trial supports the longitudinal ctDNA assessment as a relevant tool for making treatment decisions, not only for adapting treatment strategies but also for the assessments of escalating or de-escalating treatment in patients with NSCLC,” the study authors stated.

The serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) T790M mutation status demonstrated feasibility when using first-generation EGFR inhibitors to treat patients with advanced EGFR-mutated advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), supporting earlier switches to treatment with osimertinib (Tagrisso), according to findings from arms B and C of the phase 2 APPLE trial (NCT02856893).

Among patients initially receiving gefitinib (Iressa) until emergence of ctDNA EGFR T790Mm mutation in arm B or until progressive disease in arm C, respectively, the overall response rate (ORR) was 53.2% (95% CI, 38.1%-67.9%) and 56.8% (95% CI, 41.0%-71.7%). Additionally, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.4-17.5) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.1-12.9) in each respective arm.

In arm B, 17% of patients switched to treatment with osimertinib due to a T790M mutation observed during ctDNA analysis, and 51% switched due to disease progression without T790M mutation detected in ctDNA. In arm C, 77% of patients switched to osimertinib. The ORR after switching to osimertinib was 65.6% (95% CI, 46.8%-81.4%) in arm B and 58.8% (95% CI, 40.7%-75.4%) in arm C (P = .5692).

In arm B, the PFS rate with osimertinib at 18 months (PFSR-OSI-18) was 67.2% (84% CI, 56.4%-75.9%), with rates of 87.5% (84% CI, 38.7%-98.1%) for those who switched to osimertinib based on molecular progression and 62.5% (84% CI, 40.5%-78.4%) for those who switched based on progressive disease; the median follow-up was 30 months. The median PFS among those who switched based on molecular progression and those who switched based on progressive disease, respectively, were 22.1 months (95% CI, 21.9-not reached [NR]) and 21.9 months (95% CI, 16.6-NR). Additionally, the PFSR-OSI-18 was 53.5% (84% CI, 42.3%-63.5%) for those in arm C.

In an exploratory comparison between arms B and C, the median PFS was 22.0 months (95% CI, 18.6-NR) vs 20.2 months (95% CI, 14.6-35.0) in each respective arm (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 90% CI, 0.51-1.27; P = .22). A subgroup analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in outcomes between arms B and C, including all EGFR mutation subgroups and those with central nervous system metastases at study entry.

“…The APPLE trial supports the longitudinal ctDNA assessment as a relevant tool for making treatment decisions, not only for adapting treatment strategies but also for the assessments of escalating or de-escalating treatment in patients with NSCLC,” the study authors stated. “In this last scenario, the baseline ctDNA status may help to detect patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with worse prognosis.”

In the multi-center, non-comparative phase 2 EORTC-1613-APPLE trial, investigators treated patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC across 3 arms. Patients received 80 mg of up-front osimertinib daily until disease progression based on RECIST v1.1 criteria in exploratory arm A, 250 mg of gefitinib daily until detection of T790M-positive ctDNA followed by osimertinib in arm B, or gefitinib until disease progression followed by osimertinib in arm C.

The primary end point was PFSR-OSI-18 in arm B. Secondary end points included PFS, ORR, overall survival (OS), and brain PFS (BPFS).

Patients with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 criteria, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and an archival tissue sample were eligible for enrollment on the trial.

Between November 2017 and February 2020, investigators enrolled 52 patients into arm B and 51 patients into arm C. The median age was 69 years (range, 31-83) in arm B and 61 years (range, 33-89) in arm C. In arms B and C, respectively, most patients were female (75% vs 65%), never smoked (71% vs 59%), and had tumors harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations (64% vs 65%).

In arms B and C, respectively, the median OS was NR and 42.8 months (95% CI, 27.0-NR), and the 18-month OS probability was 87.0% (84% CI, 78.1%-92.5%) and 77.3% (95% CI, 66.9%-84.8%). The median BPFS was 24.4 months (95% CI, 17.9%-28.6%) and 21.4 months (95% CI, 14.5%-42.8%) in each arm (HR, 1.05; 90% CI, 0.65-1.69; P = .57).

Adverse effects (AEs) occurred in 98% of patients in arm B, including treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) in 88%. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 19% of patients, with diarrhea being the most common. Additionally, grade 3 or higher AEs and TRAEs during osimertinib treatment occurred in 91% and 9% of patients, respectively.

Overall, 10% of patients in both arm B and C discontinued treatment with gefitinib due to toxicity. No patients discontinued treatment with osimertinib due to AEs. Additionally, 10% of patients in arm B had osimertinib dose reductions compared with none in arm C.

Reference

Remon J, Besse B, Aix SP, et al. Osimertinib treatment based on plasma T790M monitoring in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EORTC Lung Cancer Group 1613 APPLE phase II randomized clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(5):468-476. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.012

Recent Videos
Patrick Oh, MD, highlights next steps for further research in treating patients with systemic therapy in addition to radiotherapy for early-stage NSCLC.
Increased use of systemic therapies, particularly among patients with high-risk node-negative NSCLC, were observed following radiotherapy.
Interest in novel therapies to improve outcomes initiated an investigation of the use of immunotherapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD, and Wade T. Iams, MD, experts on lung cancer
Related Content