Differentiating Benign Renal Tumors From Chromophobe RCC

Article

A radiographic measure may help clinicians distinguish between benign renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Researchers have identified a radiographic measure to help clinicians distinguish between benign renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in patients with renal tumors.

Tumor-to-cortex peak early-phase enhancement ratio (PEER) using multiphase CT accurately distinguished 100% of the tumors in a study published recently in Clinical Cancer Research.

“Current inability to reliably differentiate benign renal oncocytomas from renal cell carcinoma using needle core biopsy remains the primary reason behind routine surgical resection of these benign tumors, which is associated with frequent perioperative morbidity and an estimated annual health care cost approaching 100 million dollars in the United States alone,” wrote researchers led by Jay Amin, of the department of urology at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York.

Amin and colleagues conducted this study to identify variables that might aid in preoperative differentiation of renal tumors in order to avoid unnecessary resections. Their analysis included 124 patients undergoing nephrectomy at a single institution, 133 tumors were studied. Patient data from 2003–2012 was used for a retrospective cohort (n = 87). The researchers then conducted a prospective validation study among 22 consecutive tumors resected from 2013–2017.

In the retrospective cohort, patients younger than 50 were significantly associated with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, with an 80% specificity and a 24% sensitivity.

“Although an age cutoff of [50 years old] had high specificity for [chromophobe renal cell carcinoma], the optimal age cutoff to discern these two subtypes needs to be better defined in larger studies with statistical analyses designed to identify this cutoff,” the researchers wrote.

 Additionally, multifocality was 100% specific for renal oncocytoma, but only 24% sensitivity.

“The variable most reliably associated with renal oncocytoma vs chromophobe renal cell carcinoma diagnosis was the CT peak signal intensity within a tumor, particularly when expressed as a tumor-to-cortex ratio,” the researchers wrote.

There were 54 PEER-evaluable tumors in the retrospective cohort. PEER classified each tumor correctly as either renal oncocytoma (PEER > .50) or chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (PEER .50 or greater), except for four misclassified CD117-negative chromophobe renal cell carcinoma variants.

In the prospective cohort, PEER confirmed 100% accuracy for both tumor types among 22 additional tumors.

“Goals of this future research should include verification of the optimal PEER cutoff value for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma vs renal oncocytoma differentiation,” the researchers wrote. “The cutoff PEER value of .50 in our prospective cohort was arbitrarily selected on the basis of our retrospective observations; however, a cutoff PEER value of .55 would have achieved 100% diagnostic accuracy in both the retrospective and prospective cohorts.”

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content