Digital Pathology and AI May be ‘Valuable Tools’ in Prostate Cancer

Commentary
Video

Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.

Novel tools such as digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) may prove to be “valuable” and lead to more personalized treatment of patients with prostate cancer, according to Eric Li, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, Li, a urology resident at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, discussed his key takeaways from a presentation on the 15-year follow-up findings from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening study. This study examined the capability of an AI-derived digital pathology biomarker in predicting prostate cancer–specific survival in a population of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Specifically, Li indicated that the AI technology is still in its early days, and that the study was the first notable assessment of its efficacy. He stated that larger cohort studies are still needed to further confirm the model’s benefit, although it’s possible that the technology could be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow.

Transcript:

This [research] was just like a first dive—just the tip of the iceberg. We could further develop artificial intelligence models for patients undergoing surgery in larger cohorts. But really, more healthcare systems have started incorporating digitization of their slides. These models can be seamlessly incorporated into clinical workflow and help inform patient decision-making, specifically regarding whether they need postoperative androgen deprivation therapy or postoperative radiation.

The other thing that I would just like to mention is that the PLCO [study] was a historic cohort that was started in the 1990s. We haven't really had modern tools, just prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA] imaging or some of the systemic therapies that we could give nowadays. The next step is going to be trying to incorporate digital pathology biomarkers into clinical trial designs, just to see how it can affect contemporary survival.

Among the biomarkers, digital pathology and artificial intelligence can be really valuable tools for clinicians to help personalize management for patients.

Reference

Li E. A.I. derived digital pathology biomarker predicts prostate cancer specific survival for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy from PLCO trial with over 15 years of follow-up. 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; November 28-December 1, 2023; Washington, DC.

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content