Diving Into the Practical Applications of ctDNA in Oncology Care

Commentary
Podcast

Experts discuss key considerations for applying ctDNA to clinical practice, such as distinguishing between tumor-informed and tumor-uninformed testing.

In this episode of Oncology Decoded, hosts Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discussed the role that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may play in the monitoring and management of genitourinary cancers as well as other disease types with their colleague, Arnab Basu, MBBS, MPH, FACP.

The group began by providing an overview of ctDNA’s importance in the field, with Basu highlighting his initial use of the marker when treating patients with colorectal cancer who were experiencing toxicity in the adjuvant setting. Additionally, Basu distinguished between tumor-informed and tumor-uninformed testing, emphasizing an approach that monitors for actionable genes that can inform targeted decision-making from a therapeutic standpoint. Describing how the chance of a false positive is less than 1%, Basu stated that a positive result in the adjuvant setting almost certainly guarantees the need for therapy.

As part of the discussion, the experts considered the utility of ctDNA based on prior findings from studies like the phase 3 NIAGARA trial (NCT03732677), in which higher ctDNA clearance from baseline to the time before radical cystectomy correlated with an enhanced benefit with the addition of durvalumab (Imfinzi) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the potential next steps in the field, the group spoke about the potential use of urine ctDNA testing in bladder cancer, the possibility of investigating the de-escalation of imaging, and the need for additional cross-comparison data on different mechanisms of ctDNA testing.

Bupathi is executive cochair of the Genitourinary Cancer Research Executive Committee at Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI) and medical oncologist with Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers specializing in solid tumors and genitourinary cancers. Garmezy is associate director of genitourinary research and executive cochair of the Genitourinary Cancer Research Executive Committee at SCRI and medical oncologist at SCRI Oncology Partners specializing in genitourinary cancers. Basu is the senior associate consultant and a medical oncologist specializing in the care of genitourinary cancers at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cance Center.

Reference

Powles T, Van Der Heijden MS, Wang Y, et al. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who received perioperative durvalumab (D) in NIAGARA. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):4503. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.4503

Recent Videos
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Computational models help researchers anticipate how ADCs may behave in later lines of development, while they are still in the early stages.
ADC payloads with high levels of potency can sometimes lead to higher levels of toxicity, which can eliminate the therapeutic window for patients with cancer.
According to Greg Thurber, PhD, target-mediated uptake is the biggest driver of efficacy for antibody-drug conjugates as a cancer treatment.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to expect at the 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium, such as new chemotherapeutics and targeted therapies.
In neuroendocrine tumor management, patients with insulinoma may be at risk of severe hypoglycemia following receipt of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Related Content