Dr. Dent Discusses Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Video

Dr. Rebecca Dent, oncologist at the National Cancer Center, Singapore, discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in early-stage breast cancer.

We spoke with Dr. Rebecca Dent, MD, at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2019, held in Barcelona, Spain from September 27, 2019 to October 1, 2019. Dr. Dent shared the use of immunotherapy in early-stage breast cancer in relation to the KEYNOTE-522 study.

Transcript:

"The bigger question is ‘what should be the chemotherapy backbone?’  We know that certain chemotherapies can actually act like immunomodulators. If you look at specifically platinum-based chemotherapy, what we know is that actually can suppress some of the immunosuppressive elements of breast cancer, specifically looking at suppression of myeloid stem cells and tumor-associated macrophages. We have the biology to explain why it would work earlier and now we actually have a study that actually looked at that.

The KEYNOTE-522 study was looking at early, triple-negative breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting…a really representative population with almost half the patients being node-positive. It included PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, but about 80% of those patients were PD-L1 positive. The backbone of this particular study was looking at an anthracycline/taxane-platinum which is the most robust control arm you can have with the highest pathological complete response rates reported in literature and this is plus or minus pembrolizumab in the early breast cancer setting. Then the patients proceeded with surgery and then they continued on pembrolizumab (Keytruda) or a placebo.

This is the first read of the results that were presented at this meeting which showed an impressive improvement in pathological complete response rate, regardless of the definition used. The most stringent definition showed an almost 14% improvement. What was actually most interesting though was you saw an even larger benefit in the PDL-1 negative population. In those patients, again, you see greater than 15, almost 20% improvement in pathological complete response in the PD-L1 negative which we’re actually seeing hints of in some of the smaller phase II studies. Independent of PD-L1 status, immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to work."

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content