Eftilagimod Alfa/Pembrolizumab/RT Elicit Pathologic Responses in Sarcoma

Fact checked by" Ariana Pelosci
News
Article

Eftilagimod alfa with pembrolizumab and radiotherapy exceeded the median tumor hyalinization/fibrosis vs historical benchmarks in resectable soft tissue sarcomas.

The triplet treatment combination was safe, and there were no reported toxicities of grade 3 or higher related to eftilagimod alfa and pembrolizumab.

The triplet treatment combination was safe, and there were no reported toxicities of grade 3 or higher related to eftilagimod alfa and pembrolizumab.

Eftilagimod alfa (Efti) in combination with radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) met the primary end point of the phase 2 EFTISARC-NEO trial (NCT06128863), significantly exceeding the prespecified median of 35% tumor hyalinization/fibrosis vs the historical median of 15% with radiotherapy alone as a treatment for patients with resectable soft tissue sarcoma, according to a press release from the developer, Immutep Limited.1

More detailed results from the trial will be presented at a future medical meeting, according to study investigators.

Previously, in November 2024, preliminary results from the trial were shared at the Connective Tissue Oncology Society Annual Meeting.2 Those results found that, in a preliminary analysis of 21 patients, the trial demonstrated a median of 50% tumor hyalinization/fibrosis.3,4

Additionally, at the data cut-off of October 20, 2024, 71.4% of patients achieved a pathologic response defined as 35% or more hyalinization/fibrosis, and 9.5% achieved a complete pathologic response.

In the press release, it was noted that tumor hyalinization is an early surrogate end point that has been correlated with enhanced overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

EFTISARC-NEO is a single-arm, single-stage trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eftilagimod alfa with pembrolizumab and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

“It is encouraging to see the chemotherapy-free combination with [eftilagimod alfa] far exceed the ambitious target we initially set for the trial's primary end point in resectable soft tissue sarcoma. These results support our belief that [eftilagimod alfa’s] activation of antigen-presenting cells, and in turn a broad adaptive and innate immune response, helps transform the immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment of soft tissue sarcomas leading to strong anti-cancer efficacy,” stated Katarzyna Kozak, MD, PhD, and Paweł Sobczuk, MD, PhD, medical oncologists at the Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology and the trial’s principal investigators, in the press release.1

As of January 2025, the trial completed enrollment with a total of 40 patients. Eligible patients had primary or locally recurrent deep-seated extremities, girdles, and/or superficial trunk soft tissue sarcoma; a grade 2 or 3 tumor according to Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer; a primary tumor with a size of 5 cm at instrumental staging, or locally recurrent of any size; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; and non-metastatic disease.5

Those with Ewing sarcoma, Alveolar, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma; prior treatment with eftilagimod alfa and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors; and prior radiotherapy to tumor-involved sites were excluded from trial participation.

Patients received subcutaneous eftilagimod alfa at 20 mg every 2 weeks for 5 doses, intravenous pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, and radiotherapy at 50 Gy (25 x 2 Gy). Eftilagimod alfa and pembrolizumab are given concurrently with radiotherapy; surgery is scheduled 5 to 6 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy.

The trial’s primary end point was pathologic response. Secondary end points included disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, response rate, number of patients completing neoadjuvant therapy, and number of patients experiencing adverse events.

Regarding safety, it was reported that the triplet combination is safe, and no toxicities of grade 3 or higher were related to eftilagimod alfa and pembrolizumab.2

“There remains a very high unmet need in this aggressive orphan cancer indication, and we look forward to presenting detailed results at a medical meeting later this year,” Kozak and Sobczuk concluded.1

References

  1. Immutep’s Efti with radiotherapy & KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) meets primary endpoint in phase II for soft tissue sarcoma. News release. Immutep Limited. May 26, 2025. Accessed May 28, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/2apk9eu5
  2. Positive data from phase II trial in soft tissue sarcoma presented at CTOS 2024 annual meeting. News release. Immutep Limited. November 14, 2024. Accessed May 28, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/yjr7vuka
  3. Schaefer IM, Hornick JL, Barysauskas CM, et al. Histologic appearance after preoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue Sarcoma: Assessment of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Response Score. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):375-383. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.087. Epub 2017 Feb 24. PMID: 28463157.
  4. Rao SR, Lazarides AL, Leckey BL, et al. Extent of tumor fibrosis/hyalinization and infarction following neoadjuvant radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(1):194-206. doi:10.1002/cam4.4428. Epub 2021 Nov 27. PMID: 34837341; PMCID: PMC8704179.
  5. Pembrolizumab in combination with eftilagimod alpha and radiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma - EFTISARC-NEO trial (EFTISARC-NEO). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated February 10, 2025. Accessed May 28, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/mpcwvdpw
Recent Videos
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Related Content