Elders With Lenalidomide-Refractory Myeloma May Lack Optimal Treatments

Fact checked by" Russ Conroy
News
Article

A real-world study assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of elderly patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 therapy lines.

A real-world study assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of elderly patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 therapy lines.

A real-world study assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of elderly patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 therapy lines.

Population-based data on patients 65 years or older, 81% of whom had at least 1 NCI comorbidity, with lenalidomide (Revlimid)-refractory multiple myeloma treated with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy revealed poor survival outcomes and rapid therapy progression, suggesting the need for new therapeutic options, according to findings from a real-world study published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma, and Leukemia.

Data from the trial revealed that the median overall survival (OS) for all patients included in the analysis was 29.3 months (95% CI, 25.1-33.9), with OS decreasing with increasing lines of prior therapy. In patients who underwent 1, 2, and 3 prior lines of therapy, the median OS was 53.0 months (95% CI, 36.4-not estimable [NE]), 20.7 months (95% CI, 17.3-27.1), and 19.0 months (95% CI, 17.2-23.7), respectively.

Additional data reveal a similar trend in the time to next treatment (TTNT) or death, with more lines of prior therapy associated with decreased TTNT or death. Overall median TTNT or death was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.7-9.7) vs 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.7) in patients who had 1 previous line of therapy. Additionally, the median TTNT or death in those who had 2 and 3 prior lines of therapy was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-8.3) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.5-7.9), respectively.

“[T]hese population-based data on elderly patients [81% with at least 1 of the NCI comorbidities] and early-line lenalidomide-refractory disease add to the nascent body of real-world evidence describing their outcomes since the introduction of daratumumab [Darzalex],” Binod Dhakal, MD, MS, associate professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology at Froedtert Hospital and the Medical College of Wisconsin, wrote in the publication with study coinvestigators. “Poor survival and rapid progression through therapies in this difficult-to-treat patient population highlight the shortcomings of currently available therapies and the need for new and effective therapeutic options.”

The study assessed 1297 patients from the SEER cancer registry with multiple myeloma who had proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug exposure, lenalidomide-refractory disease, and 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy indexed between 2016 and 2020. The median age was 75 years (IQR, 71-79), 88% of patients were White, and 54% of patients were male. Additionally, the median time from diagnosis to index date was 22.0 months (IQR, 11.7-34.5).

A total of 22% of patients received stem cell transplantation. Most patients received 1 prior line of therapy (52%), with 34% having received 2 prior lines, and 13% having received 3 prior lines. In addition to lenalidomide, patients were also previously treated with bortezomib (Velcade, 94%), carfilzomib (Kyprolis, 13%), daratumumab (9%), ixazomib (Ninlaro, 8%), and thalidomide (Thalomid, 1%). Furthermore, the mean NCI comorbidity index score was 0.87 (SD, 0.74), with the most prevalent comorbidities including renal disease (42%), diabetes (31%), chronic pulmonary disease (28%), and congestive heart failure (28%).

Singlet, doublet, and triplet regimens were used in 32%, 34%, and 31% of patients on study. The most common drugs used during index treatment included daratumumab (43.7%) and pomalidomide (Pomalyst; 43.3%), followed by bortezomib (25.5%), carfilzomib (19.0%), and ixazomib (12.2%). Of note, daratumumab and pomalidomide use increased with exposure to more lines of therapy. From 2016 to 2020, daratumumab use increased from 8.1% to 53.0%, and pomalidomide use increased from 40.4% to 41.8%. Alternatively, bortezomib use decreased during the same period, from 28.7% in 2016 to 24.8% in 2020.

The study assessed OS and TTNT or death, with TTNT defined as the time from first index date to the initiation of the next line of treatment or death.

Reference

Dhakal B, He J, Schecter JM, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma with 1 to 3 prior lines: SEER-Medicare database. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. Published January 23, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.009

Recent Videos
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Current FDA expectations may allow patients to return to their community physicians at 2 weeks after administration of anitocabtagene autoleucel.
Based on its mechanism of action, anito-cel may cause fewer instances of cytokine release syndrome and delayed toxicities vs other therapies.
Combining daratumumab with other agents is one strategy that investigators are exploring in the smoldering multiple myeloma field.
A substantial portion of patients who received daratumumab in the AQUILA study were able to delay disease progression to active multiple myeloma.
The approval of daratumumab validates the notion of using limited therapy to help delay progression from smoldering disease to multiple myeloma.
Related Content