Embracing the Complexity of Somatic Alterations in Kidney Cancer Care

Commentary
Video

Machine learning–based approaches may play a role in further understanding of how somatic alterations influence responses or resistance to therapy.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during a visit to Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Connecticut, David A. Braun, MD, PhD, detailed his group’s work in understanding how somatic alterations may affect responses or resistance to treatment among patients with kidney cancer.

Braun, assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine and principal investigator in the Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology within the Yale Cancer Center, stated that it is crucial to embrace the complexity of biomarkers in kidney cancer, as individual genetic alterations alone would not determine whether a tumor responds to therapy. As part of dissecting each potential predictor of response or resistance to treatment, Braun described how approaches such as machine learning–based tools may play a role in advancing the field’s understanding of these factors.

Transcript:

Our research group and many others have investigated this question of how somatic alterations might impact responses or resistance to therapy for many years. The hope, initially, was a simple answer: that we would find something like the EGFR mutation in lung cancer; someone has this mutation, [so] they will respond to a drug, and if they do not have this mutation, they will not. What we have realized over the years is that it’s much more complicated than that. The kidney cancer genetic landscape and the immune microenvironment are both important factors, and that’s not necessarily going to be one thing—one genetic alteration—that’s going to make the difference between whether a tumor responds or doesn’t respond to a treatment.

What we start to move toward is embracing that complexity, understanding that it’s the genetic landscape of the cancer, the immune cells that are there, and other factors that altogether work to determine whether a cancer will effectively respond or not. [Many] of our efforts now have been dissecting each of those individual parts and then using a lot of approaches, including machine learning–based approaches, to put it all together.

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Related Content