Expediting Clinical Trial Processes to Advance Brain Cancer Research

Commentary
Video

Through multidisciplinary collaboration, Yoshie Umemura, MD, and colleagues were able to organize the Gliofocus trial in brain cancer relatively fast.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Yoshie Umemura, MD, about ongoing research efforts that her institution is organizing in the brain cancer field.

Umemura, the chief medical officer of the Ivy Brain Tumor Center, division chief of Neuro-Oncology, and the William and Joan Shapiro chair of Neuro-Oncology at Barrow Neurological Institute, highlighted a focus on the phase 3 Gliofocus trial (NCT06388733), in which she and co-investigators will evaluate treatment with niraparib (Zejula) for patients with newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma. Additionally, she described how those at her institution have made use of a specific multidisciplinary collaboration at the Ivy Brain Tumor Center to advance their clinical trial efforts through each phase more quickly compared with traditional methods.

Transcript:

What we’re currently excited about is a phase 3 clinical trial that we are sponsoring. I’m the principal investigator at our site at the Ivy Brain Tumor Center, but as our institution, we’re sponsoring this international trial. [Although] we’re excited about the study itself, I think what’s most exciting is the way it happened. Phase 3 clinical trials often take years and years, sometimes over a decade, to [progress] from phase zero, phase 1, and phase 2 to phase 3. It takes forever. Even just opening one phase 2/3 study, from talking about the concept to getting it across to the starting line, can take years and years.

Because we have a unique platform where we try to take away some red tape safely [with] some of the multidisciplinary, creative minds that we have here, the platform was set [for us to] push from the early phase to the late phase quickly. We were able to move it just in a few years from phase zero and phase 2 to a phase 3 international trial. Having that platform and proving that we can make that happen is extremely exciting because it’s not going to be just one drug or one trial that’s going to make a difference. When there is one positive or negative trial, there are a lot of follow-up questions and follow-up trials. We can’t take 15 to 30 years to answer one simple question; we need to be able to do a lot of trials safely and effectively and have that platform to show that we can do this much quicker than the traditional method. It’s exciting.

Recent Videos
An 80% sensitivity for lung cancer was observed with the liquid biopsy, with high sensitivity observed for early-stage disease, as well.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.