Exploring the Next Frontier of Cancer Biomarkers in Precision Medicine

Commentary
Video

Beyond DNA-centric diagnostics, protein-based methods may play a role in accurately matching patients with the most effective therapies.

Regarding finding the right drug for the right patient, the reality of cancer management is far more complex than a single genetic mutation, according to David Rimm, MD, PhD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Rimm spoke about biomarker research that may hold promise in the management of melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, and other disease types. He argued that to truly improve patient outcomes, the field must expand its focus beyond DNA-based diagnostics to a more comprehensive analysis of other biomolecules. Specifically, he highlighted the potential role of protein-based methods, as well as those focused on RNA and circulating DNA, in providing a more nuanced understanding of a tumor’s behavior. These approaches, he described, may help optimize strategies for administering the right treatments to the right patients.

Rimm is the Anthony N. Brady Professor of Pathology and a professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology) at Yale University School of Medicine.

Transcript:

One of the big clinical questions is, "Who should get which drug?" This has been a question for as long as drugs have existed. As we have gotten better at precision medicine, we have [developed] more tools to help us predict responses to drugs....We have had a good run in DNA-based diagnostics, and we are still improving them. But it turns out that drugs are not always working with just 1 mutation. One mutation does not always direct us to which patient should get which drug. That’s where we are now: we need to think beyond DNA into the other biomolecules that are out there that could be taken advantage of for helping select the right drug for the right patient.

My particular interest has always been protein-based methods, but there are methods that relate to circulating DNA, whether it’s bound or free circulating DNA. There are methods that are based on the RNA or expression profiles in RNA. There’s a lot of other methods out there that we will be watching closely in the next 5 to 10 years to change the way we prescribe drugs so that we do not give the same drug to everybody but rather give the best drug to the right patient.

Recent Videos
Based on its mechanism of action, anito-cel may cause fewer instances of cytokine release syndrome and delayed toxicities vs other therapies.
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
Related Content