Exploring the Next Frontier of Cancer Biomarkers in Precision Medicine

Commentary
Video

Beyond DNA-centric diagnostics, protein-based methods may play a role in accurately matching patients with the most effective therapies.

Regarding finding the right drug for the right patient, the reality of cancer management is far more complex than a single genetic mutation, according to David Rimm, MD, PhD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Rimm spoke about biomarker research that may hold promise in the management of melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, and other disease types. He argued that to truly improve patient outcomes, the field must expand its focus beyond DNA-based diagnostics to a more comprehensive analysis of other biomolecules. Specifically, he highlighted the potential role of protein-based methods, as well as those focused on RNA and circulating DNA, in providing a more nuanced understanding of a tumor’s behavior. These approaches, he described, may help optimize strategies for administering the right treatments to the right patients.

Rimm is the Anthony N. Brady Professor of Pathology and a professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology) at Yale University School of Medicine.

Transcript:

One of the big clinical questions is, "Who should get which drug?" This has been a question for as long as drugs have existed. As we have gotten better at precision medicine, we have [developed] more tools to help us predict responses to drugs....We have had a good run in DNA-based diagnostics, and we are still improving them. But it turns out that drugs are not always working with just 1 mutation. One mutation does not always direct us to which patient should get which drug. That’s where we are now: we need to think beyond DNA into the other biomolecules that are out there that could be taken advantage of for helping select the right drug for the right patient.

My particular interest has always been protein-based methods, but there are methods that relate to circulating DNA, whether it’s bound or free circulating DNA. There are methods that are based on the RNA or expression profiles in RNA. There’s a lot of other methods out there that we will be watching closely in the next 5 to 10 years to change the way we prescribe drugs so that we do not give the same drug to everybody but rather give the best drug to the right patient.

Recent Videos
Using chlorotoxin as a targeting element may bind to more glioblastoma cells than other targeting entities, according to Michael Barish, PhD.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
The approval of daratumumab validates the notion of using limited therapy to help delay progression from smoldering disease to multiple myeloma.
A simulation procedure helped to ascertain chemotherapy tolerability before administering radioembolization therapy for NETs with liver metastases.
The addition of radioembolization to radiosensitizing chemotherapy may help concurrently treat patients with liver tumors and disease outside the liver.
In neuroendocrine tumor management, patients with insulinoma may be at risk of severe hypoglycemia following receipt of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Related Content