Extending Platinum-Free Interval Might Reduce Survival in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Article

Extending platinum-free interval with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, or gemcitabine does not improve overall survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Contrary to expectations, extending platinum-free interval (PFI) with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan, or gemcitabine does not improve-and might diminish-overall survival (OS) among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, according to a randomized phase III trial presented at the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 3–7 in Chicago (abstract 5505).

“Prolongation of the platinum-free interval with a single-agent non-platinum therapy does not improve and even worsens the outcome of ovarian cancer patients recurring 6–12 months after a platinum-containing chemotherapy,” said lead study author Sandro Pignata, MD, of the National Institute for the Study and Treatment of Cancer in Napoli, Italy. “Immediate re-treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard treatment strategy.”

Extending PFI with non-platinum therapy has long been hypothesized to improve patient outcomes.

MITO-8 is an open-label, randomized, phase III study of the association of survival outcome with single-agent non-platinum treatment to prolong PFI among patients with recurrent, partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

A total of 215 patients were enrolled in Italy, Belgium, and Germany between 2009 and 2015. Inclusion criteria for participants included ovarian cancer recurrence 6 to 12 months after platinum therapy; two or fewer previous chemotherapy lines; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2; and normal bone marrow, heart, liver, and kidney function.

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to undergo treatment with either a platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 108; carboplatin + paclitaxel or carboplatin + gemcitabine for patients exhibiting neurotoxicity at baseline) or a non–platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 107; PLD or other approved single agents).

Non-platinum therapy prolonged PFI. However, it did not improve OS-and indeed, there was a trend toward worse OS (non-platinum vs platinum: 21.8 months vs 24.5 months; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 [95% CI, 0.99–1.94]; P = .06). Median progression-free survival after second treatment was 12.8 months for patients treated with non–platinum-based chemotherapy vs 16.4 months for patients treated with platinum chemotherapy (HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.04–1.91]; P = .025).

Recent Videos
Oncologists are still working on management strategies for neuropathy; a common adverse effect related to chemotherapeutics for ovarian cancer.
Genetic testing information can be used to risk-stratify ovarian cancer survivors for breast cancer, particularly those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Genetic testing for ovarian cancer may help inform treatment decisions for patients with advanced disease, particularly regarding PARP inhibitor use.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Related Content