FDA Releases Final Guidance on Evaluating Cancer Drugs for CNS Metastases

Article

The FDA released a final guidance on evaluating cancer drugs in patients with central nervous system metastases.

A final guidance was released by the FDA, entitled, "Evaluating Cancer Drugs in Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases; Guidance for Industry," which details the optimal design for clinical trials evaluating drugs and biological products for patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases.

The guidance details important considerations for trials involving systemic therapies for this patient population should the agent's label describe anti-tumor activity in the CNS. Further considerations referenced in the guidance include ideal patient populations, available therapies, and prior therapies, as well as noting that trial designs need to take prior therapies into consideration and better plan for assessing CNS metastases.

The preferred modality cited by the guidance is baseline and periodic MRI imaging with gadolinium contrast. Additionally, RECIST 1.1, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology - Brain Metastases, should be utilized for standard response criteria evaluation for patients with CNS metastases, according to the guidance.

The guidance also details appropriate end points for studies featuring patient populations with CNS metastases and discusses the optimal way in which leptomeningeal disease should be addressed. Notably, leptomeningeal disease is considered to be a disease of the entire CNS compartment by the FDA. It also assesses updates and suggestions that were given during the comment period while the document was being drafted.

Additional updates detailed in the final guidance elucidate the optimal number of stratification factors that should be included in CNS clinical trials to minimize bias, as well as detailing that duration of CNS and systemic response to treatment need to be tracked by clinical trial investigators. The final version of the document featured an additional 6-month time period, as well as the addition of progression-free survival for patients who have brain metastases when CNS is a common metastatic site.

Reference

Evaluating cancer drugs in patients with central nervous system metastases; guidance for industry. Federal Registrar. 2021;86(125):35305-35306.

Recent Videos
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Point-of-care manufacturing, scalable manufacturing, and bringing the cost down [can help].
A novel cancer database may assist patients determine what clinical trials they are eligible to enroll on and identify the next best steps for treatment.
A consolidated database may allow providers to access information on a patient’s prior treatments and genetic abnormalities all in 1 place.
A study presented at ASTRO 2025 evaluated the feasibility of using a unified cancer database to consolidate information gathered across 14 institutions.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ESMO Annual Congress, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Physical therapists may play a key role in patient care before, during, and after treatment for cancer, according to Alison Ankiewicz, PT, DPT.
Related Content