Finding the Best Setting for Bispecific T-Cell Engagers in Multiple Myeloma

Commentary
Video

Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.

Shebli Atrash, MD, discussed considerations for optimizing T-cell engager efficacy in an interview with CancerNetwork® following his presentation on T-cell engagers in multiple myeloma that he gave at the 2025 Immune Cell Effector Therapy (ICE-T) Conference.

Atrash, medical oncologist at Levine Cancer Institute and clinical associate professor of Medicine at Wake Forest University, expressed that T-cell engager effectiveness is variable based on the setting by which it used. To illustrate this, he explained that using the T-cell engager talquetamab-tgvs (Talvey) prior to CAR T therapy may help with reducing the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).

On the other hand, he stated that using bispecifics for patients with rapidly progressing disease and high disease burden may not exhibit the same efficacy or clinical benefit for patients, underscoring a need to consider how and when they are used, as well as who will most benefit from their use.

In conclusion, Atrash expressed a need in the field to identify why approximately 30% of patients do not respond to treatment with bispecific T-cell engagers, suggesting that it may have to do with the host immune system, fitness, and cancer cell soluble BCMA levels.

Transcript:

Using those bispecific [T-cell] engagers in the right setting is important. For example, utilizing talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a pre-CAR T drug to control myeloma prior to administering CAR T has helped us with decreasing CRS and ICANS. [Additionally, regarding] my experience with teclistamab, if it’s used in patients who are rapidly progressing with large disease burden, then it might not provide as much efficacy as it does for other patients. I feel the future directions will be regarding how to use it, when to use it, [and] which population is more fit for those treatments.

Also, we have noticed that when you start the treatment in the first month or 2, you get a drop of about 30% in the survival curves, indicating that those patients did not respond to treatment. Predicting who [make up that] 30% is important, and this has to do with the host immune system, fitness, as well as the cancer cell soluble BCMA levels. Those are the important takeaways.

Reference

Atrash S. Emerging T-cell engagers & novel immunotargets in multiple myeloma. Presented at the 2025 National Immune Cell Effector Therapy (ICE-T) Conference; July 26, 2025; Orlando, FL.

Recent Videos
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
Related Content