Finding the Best Setting for Bispecific T-Cell Engagers in Multiple Myeloma

Commentary
Video

Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.

Shebli Atrash, MD, discussed considerations for optimizing T-cell engager efficacy in an interview with CancerNetwork® following his presentation on T-cell engagers in multiple myeloma that he gave at the 2025 Immune Cell Effector Therapy Conference.

Atrash, medical oncologist at Levine Cancer Institute and clinical associate professor of medicine at Wake Forest University, expressed that T-cell engager effectiveness is variable based on the setting in which it is used. To illustrate this, he explained that using the T-cell engager talquetamab-tgvs (Talvey) prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may help reduce the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).

On the other hand, he stated that using bispecifics for patients with rapidly progressing disease and high disease burden may not exhibit the same efficacy or clinical benefit for patients, underscoring a need to consider how and when they are used as well as who will most benefit from their use.

In conclusion, Atrash expressed a need in the field to identify why approximately 30% of patients do not respond to treatment with bispecific T-cell engagers, suggesting that it may have to do with the host immune system, fitness, and cancer cell soluble BCMA levels.

Transcript:

Using those bispecific [T-cell] engagers in the right setting is important. For example, utilizing talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a pre–CAR T drug to control myeloma prior to administering CAR T has helped us with decreasing CRS and ICANS. [Additionally, regarding] my experience with teclistamab, if it’s used in patients who are rapidly progressing with large disease burden, then it might not provide as much efficacy as it does for other patients. I feel the future directions will be regarding how to use it, when to use it, [and] which population is most fit for those treatments.

Also, we have noticed that when you start the treatment in the first month or two, you get a drop of about 30% in the survival curves, indicating that those patients did not respond to treatment. Predicting who [makes up that] 30% is important, and this has to do with the host immune system, fitness, as well as the cancer cell soluble BCMA levels. Those are the important takeaways.

Reference

Atrash S. Emerging T-cell engagers & novel immunotargets in multiple myeloma. Presented at: 2025 National Immune Cell Effector Therapy Conference; July 26, 2025; Orlando, FL.

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content