Frontline Treatment Options in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Show Promise

News
Video

“We need some longer-term overall survival data to help discuss with patients the best treatment of choice for them,” Christine Bestvina, MD, said.

Christine Bestvina, MD, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Chicago, spoke with CancerNetwork® about how she believes that there have been a lot of positive, exciting advancements in frontline EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The phase 3 MARIPOSA trial (NCT04487080) evaluating amivantamab-vmjw (Rybrevant) and lazertinib (Lacluze) and the phase 3 FLAURA2 trial (NCT04035486) evaluating osimertinib (Tagrisso) with or without chemotherapy.1,2 Both studied patients who had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

In the MARIPOSA trial, the experimental regimen elicited a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 23.7 months when compared with 16.6 months from osimertinib alone (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85; P <.001). In the FLAURA2 trial, the median follow-up for PFS was 19.5 months in the osimertinib and chemotherapy group and 16.5 months in the osimertinib alone group.

One of the major questions still facing the physician community, however, is how to decide which patients need escalated therapy. It could be patients with an L858R mutation, with baseline brain metastasis, or with a significant burden of disease, Bestvina noted.

Transcript:

The frontline [EGFR-mutated NSCLC] space is exciting right now. We’ve seen promising results thus far from both the MARIPOSA [regimen] as well as the FLAURA2 regimen, in addition to what we previously had, which is osimertinib monotherapy. We’re still trying to understand what patients need escalated therapy, whether that’s osimertinib plus chemotherapy or amivantamab plus lazertinib in the front line because there are patients who do not perform as well despite having an EGFR mutation. Is that patients who have an L858R mutation? Is that patients with baseline brain metastasis? Are those patients who have a significant burden of disease? I’m discussing these more aggressive or escalated treatment options with patients right now, but we need some longer-term overall survival data to help discuss with patients what is the best treatment of choice for them.

References

  1. Cho BC, Lu S, Felip E, et al. Amivantamab plus lazertinib in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(16):1486-1498. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2403614
  2. Planchard D, Jänne PA, Cheng Y, et al. Osimertinib with or without chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1935-1948. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2306434
Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Related Content