Gene Expression Assay May Guide Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ Management

Commentary
Video

Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.

A 12-gene expression assay has yielded “encouraging results” in the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial (NCT02352883), and support potentially guiding treatment decision-making for patients with breast cancer with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) score estimates, according to Seema A. Khan, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Khan, a professor of surgery in the Surgical Oncology Division of Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, discussed the rationale for assessing an assay’s feasibility in helping identify patients who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery based on a potential correlation between the genetic expression of their DCIS lesion and the risk of recurrent disease. She stated that the DCIS scores may be a reasonable consideration for guiding whether patients should receive radiation, although she suggested that additional trials are necessary to further evaluate the assay’s predictive ability.

Khan presented these findings at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).

Transcript:

Our group, ECOG, started a trial a while ago in the 1990s where [patients] with what was considered to be known as DCIS were advised to not receive radiotherapy. Those results led to the present trial—the one that we’re reporting today. During the development of that 1990s trial, there was a biological assay that was developed that measured the expression of 12 genes; that’s now called the DCIS score. In the E4112 trial that we’re reporting, part of our strategy was to use the DCIS score to advise [patients] whether their risk of disease recurrence in the breast was low enough that they could avoid radiation. On the other hand, [we would] advise [patients] with higher DCIS risk scores to receive radiation because their risk of invasive recurrence was higher.

The takeaway message at the moment is that these are encouraging results for the use of molecular assays to guide [treatment]. Patients who are given advice based on real information about the assay, according to these results, do follow that advice. So far, the predictive performance of these assays is working out as expected. If there are open trials available, that’s always the best course; that will give us more answers. But in clinical practice, the use of this DCIS score in the manner that we used it in this trial is a reasonable consideration and should be offered to patients with an adequate explanation of what we know and what we don’t know.

Reference

Khan S, Romanoff J, Gatsonis C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and a 12-gene expression assay to optimize local therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: 5-year clinical outcomes of ECOG-ACRIN 4112. Presented at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 5-9, 2023; San Antonio, TX; abstract GS03-01.

Recent Videos
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Related Content