Genetic Data May Inform Personalized Radiotherapy Strategies for Cancer Care

Commentary
Video

Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.

Just as it has become a guiding tool for chemotherapeutic strategies, the use of patient genetics may become more common in planning radiotherapy for patients with different types of cancer, according to Rachit Kumar, MD.

Kumar spoke with CancerNetwork® about where he hopes to see the radiation oncology field evolve with respect to the use of genetic information to inform radiotherapy decision-making. As part of achieving personalized cancer care, Kumar highlighted the prospect of using genetics to influence aspects of therapy, such as the length of radiation, while elucidating whether a patient has localized or metastatic disease burden.

Kumar is an assistant professor of radiation oncology and molecular radiation sciences at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and a radiation oncologist specializing in genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancers at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center for Sibley Memorial Hospital and Suburban Hospital.

Transcript:

The idea of personalized medicine is obviously a buzzword in all cancer care, and that’s what every patient wants. That’s what providers want as well. We as physicians want to make sure that we’re giving patients the right option for them, not just a boilerplate option for their cancer and stage.

Where I think that we’re homing in now is [answering this question]: "How can we use the genetics of a patient’s cancer to make treatment decisions?" There are some diseases where that’s used quite widely in chemotherapy. For example, a lot of chemotherapy agents are specifically tailored to genetic alterations in patients. We’ve been doing that less so with radiation, but I think that there will be more and more trials that come out looking at the genetics of a patient’s cancer to say, based on this gene profile [or] protein expression profile, should [a patient] get a longer course of radiation? Should [they] get a shorter course of radiation? Is [their] disease more likely to be a local disease burden than a distant metastatic disease burden? If so, if it is a local disease burden, can we use local radiation more, and perhaps more than chemotherapy, to help attack that disease? Using genetics to guide our treatment, which has become much more common and much more mainstream in chemotherapy, will now become more common in radiation as well.

Recent Videos
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
A new partnership agreement involving AI use may help spread radiotherapeutic standards from academic centers to more patients in community-based practices.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Recent findings presented at ASTRO 2025 suggest an “exciting opportunity” to expand the role of radiation oncology in different non-malignant indications.
The 3 most likely directions of radiotherapy advancements come from new technology, combinations with immunotherapy, and the incorporation of particle therapy.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Related Content