Genetic Data May Inform Personalized Radiotherapy Strategies for Cancer Care

Commentary
Video

Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.

Just as it has become a guiding tool for chemotherapeutic strategies, the use of patient genetics may become more common in planning radiotherapy for patients with different types of cancer, according to Rachit Kumar, MD.

Kumar spoke with CancerNetwork® about where he hopes to see the radiation oncology field evolve with respect to the use of genetic information to inform radiotherapy decision-making. As part of achieving personalized cancer care, Kumar highlighted the prospect of using genetics to influence aspects of therapy, such as the length of radiation, while elucidating whether a patient has localized or metastatic disease burden.

Kumar is an assistant professor of radiation oncology and molecular radiation sciences at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and a radiation oncologist specializing in genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancers at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center for Sibley Memorial Hospital and Suburban Hospital.

Transcript:

The idea of personalized medicine is obviously a buzzword in all cancer care, and that’s what every patient wants. That’s what providers want as well. We as physicians want to make sure that we’re giving patients the right option for them, not just a boilerplate option for their cancer and stage.

Where I think that we’re homing in now is [answering this question]: "How can we use the genetics of a patient’s cancer to make treatment decisions?" There are some diseases where that’s used quite widely in chemotherapy. For example, a lot of chemotherapy agents are specifically tailored to genetic alterations in patients. We’ve been doing that less so with radiation, but I think that there will be more and more trials that come out looking at the genetics of a patient’s cancer to say, based on this gene profile [or] protein expression profile, should [a patient] get a longer course of radiation? Should [they] get a shorter course of radiation? Is [their] disease more likely to be a local disease burden than a distant metastatic disease burden? If so, if it is a local disease burden, can we use local radiation more, and perhaps more than chemotherapy, to help attack that disease? Using genetics to guide our treatment, which has become much more common and much more mainstream in chemotherapy, will now become more common in radiation as well.

Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Related Content