Genetic Prostate Cancer Studies Are Needed to Push the Needle Forward

Commentary
Video

Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.

Research into genetic testing as a tool for localized diagnosis is still in its early days across most cancer types, and prostate cancer is no exception, according to William J. Catalona, MD.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, Catalona, a professor of urology at the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, emphasized the necessity of conducting additional genetic studies in the prostate cancer space to collect firm evidence. From there, robust guidelines can be drafted and implemented.

Transcript:

We're relatively early in the phase of genetic studies of prostate cancer. Many of [our] colleagues may not be as familiar with all of the latest developments if their area is focused in, say, radiation therapy, medical oncology, or other areas. Hopefully, they [have] learned a little something about what's current in the genetics of prostate cancer [from my presentation]. The other thing is that we really need to [base] our clinical guidelines for managing patients on firm scientific evidence. Without the genetic research, that firm scientific evidence is not there. Once we have the firm scientific evidence, then we have robust guidelines. But then we have to move beyond the robust guidelines into a field called implementation science, where we have to persuade the doctors and patients out there to do the right thing because there's good scientific evidence to support adopting these guidelines.

Reference

Catalona WJ. Localized diagnosis: genetic testing. 2023 Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; November 28-December 1, 2023; Washington, DC.

Recent Videos
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
A combined cohort composed of patients from the TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung-05 trials showed a survival advantage with dato-DXd vs docetaxel.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Osimertinib/chemotherapy and amivantamab/lazertinib have exhibited an efficacy advantage vs osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Related Content