Higher MRD Negativity Rates Occur with Isa-RD in Older NDMM Population

Fact checked by" Russ Conroy
News
Article

Patients 70 years and older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma experienced higher response rates and prolonged survival with Isa-Rd vs Rd alone.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.4 months in the isatuximab arm vs 20.2 months in the Rd alone arm.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.4 months in the isatuximab arm vs 20.2 months in the Rd alone arm.

The addition of isatuximab (Sarclisa) to lenalidomide (Revlimid) and dexamethasone (Isa-Rd) exhibited a significantly higher minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10-5vs Rd alone in patients 70 years and older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to findings from the phase 2 AGMT-MM04 trial (NCT04891809) exhibited in a poster presentation at the 2025 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition.

Efficacy findings from the phase 2 trial revealed that, after a median follow-up of 14.6 months, among patients treated with Isa-Rd (n = 70) vs Rd (n = 67), the MRD negativity rates were 38.5% vs 2.5%. Additionally, 24.3% vs 9.0% of the respective groups experienced a complete response (CR), and 31.4% vs 19.4% experienced a very good partial response (VGPR) as best response. The time to best response in the respective arms was 7.3 months in both cohorts (P = .78).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.4 months in the isatuximab arm vs 20.2 months in the Rd alone arm. Additionally, the 24-month PFS rates were 65.8% vs 37.6%, respectively (P = .0094). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either arm; the respective 24-month rates were 87.4% vs 72.1% (P = .11).

The median PFS based on cytogenetic risk among both arms was 20.2 months in patients with high-risk disease and 38.4 months in those with standard-risk disease (P = .028). Additionally, patients with detectable circulating tumor cells at day 8 experienced a median PFS of 14.5 months vs 38.4 months among those who did not, with 24-month rates of 25.6% vs 64.3%, respectively (P = .0044).

“Our data show a significantly higher [MRD negativity] rate at 10-5 after 8 cycles of induction therapy with Isa-Rd compared to Rd [at] 38.5% vs 2.5%,” Heinz Ludwig, MD, professor of Medical Oncology/Hematology at the Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute in Vienna, wrote in the presentation with study coinvestigators. “Additional benefits of Isa-Rd include a higher rate of CR and VGPR [or better], a significantly longer PFS, and a favorable safety and tolerance profile in very [old] patients with [newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].”

A total of 137 were enrolled in the trial, of whom 5 discontinued therapy within the first cycle due to patient or investigator decision for 3 patients, death in 1 patient, and disease progression in another patient. Between cycles 2 and 8, disease progression or death was noted in 3 patients in the Isa-Rd arm and 15 in the Rd arm. Four patients in each arm discontinued due to adverse effects (AEs) or withdrawal of consent.

Patients in the control and experimental arms had a median age of 78 years (range, 70-91) vs 76 years (range, 70-91), and most in either arm were male (53.7% vs 58.6%). The majority of patients had an ECOG performance status of 1 (52.2% vs 50.0%) and standard-risk cytogenetics (55.6% vs 52.2%). A total of 40.3% vs 27.1% had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease.

The most common grade 3 or higher hematologic AEs in the control and experimental arms, respectively, included neutropenia (25.4% vs 27.1%), thrombocytopenia (9.0% vs 2.9%), and anemia (7.5% vs 10.0%). Additionally, the most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic AEs included infections (26.9% vs 27.1%), pain and discomfort (7.5% vs 8.6%), arrhythmia (6.0% vs 1.4%), injury (4.5% vs 2.9%), and asthenic conditions (4.5% vs 5.7%).

Reference

Ludwig H, Melchardt T, Terpos E, et al. Randomized comparison between isatuximab-rd versus rd induction, followed by isa-R versus R maintenance in very elderly patients with NDMM: efficacy data on MRD after induction (AGMT-MM04 Trial). Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):2258. doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2258

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Although a greater risk of CNS relapse may emerge with immunotherapy-based backbones, toxicities associated with chemotherapy are avoided.
Related Content