Identifying Common Toxicities With Targeted Therapies in GI Malignancies

Fact checked by" Justin Mancini
Commentary
Video

Skin toxicities are common with targeted therapies for GI malignancies but can be remedied by preventive measures and a collaboration with dermatology.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Rona Yaeger, MD, gastrointestinal medical oncologist and early drug development specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, spoke about common toxicities that might emerge with targeted therapies, including BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR inhibitors, when treating patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. The discussion was contextualized by a session she delivered titled “Targeting BRAF, KRAS, and HER2 in GI Tumors” at the 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium in New York, New York.

Yaeger began by explaining that targeted therapies are mechanistically different from chemotherapy, with the former offering more specificity but unique toxicities. One common type, skin toxicity, requires proactive management, with Yaeger’s team working with dermatology to manage symptoms.

Additionally, she highlighted the approval of encorafenib (Braftovi), which has been shown to counteract acneiform rash events that emerge from treatment with cetuximab (Erbitux). Although these patients may not experience rash, dry skin may be common, with her team advising patients to moisturize and limit sun exposure. Yaeger concluded by highlighting diarrhea events that occur with these treatments, which can be proactively monitored for and treated with antidiarrheal agents.

Transcript:

Targeted therapies work differently from chemotherapy, and rather than hitting all the rapidly dividing cells, they are more specific and may have unique toxicities, and the toxicities vary across the targets for some treatments such as EGFR inhibitors or RAS inhibitors. Entering the clinic, skin toxicity is a key [adverse] effect, and we try to be proactive in managing that, both by giving preventive medications, such as using antibiotics, and involving dermatology when patients have toxicity.

With the BRAF [inhibitors]––with approval for encorafenib––generally, it does not cause the acneiform rash and it seems to oppose the effect of cetuximab. Patients getting encorafenib and cetuximab do not tend to have many rashes, but dry skin is common, and we tell patients to moisturize and be careful with sun [exposure]. Some of the targeted therapies can also cause diarrhea. That’s a common [adverse] effect, and again, it’s good to be proactive, make sure patients are aware, and we can give antidiarrheal agents.

Reference

Yaeger R. Targeting BRAF, KRAS, and HER2 in GI tumors. Presented at: 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium; November 12-14, 2025; New York, NY.

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
With many treatments emerging in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer landscape, sequencing therapy has emerged as a key consideration for these patients.