Identifying Common Toxicities with Targeted Therapies in GI Malignancies

Commentary
Video

Skin toxicities are common with targeted therapies for GI malignancies but can be remedied by preventative measures and a collaboration with dermatology.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Rona Yaeger, MD, gastrointestinal medical oncologist and Early Development Specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke about common toxicities that might emerge with targeted therapies, including BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR inhibitors, when treating patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. The discussion was contextualized by a session she delivered titled, “Targeting BRAF, KRAS, and HER2 in GI Tumors” at the 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium (CFS) in New York, NY.

Yaeger began by explaining that targeted therapies are mechanistically different from chemotherapy, with the former offering more specificity but unique toxicities. One common type, skin toxicities, require proactive management, with Yaeger’s team working with dermatology to manage these symptoms.

Additionally, she highlighted the approval of encorafenib (Braftovi), which has been shown to counteract acneiform rash events which emerge from treatment with cetuximab (Erbitux). Although these patients may not experience rash, dry skin may be common, with her team advising patients to moisturize and limit sun exposure. Yaeger concluded by highlighting diarrhea events that occur with these treatments, which can be proactively monitored for and treated with anti-diarrheal agents.

Transcript:

Targeted therapies work differently from chemotherapy, and rather than hitting all the rapidly dividing cells, they are more specific and may have unique toxicities, and the toxicities vary across the targets. For some treatments such as EGFR inhibitors or RAS inhibitors. Entering the clinic, skin toxicity is a key [adverse] effect, and we try to be proactive in managing that, both by giving preventative medications, such as using antibiotics and involving dermatology when patients have toxicity.

With the BRAF [inhibitors]––with approval for encorafenib––generally, it does not cause the acneiform rash, and it seems to oppose the effect of cetuximab. Patients getting encorafenib and cetuximab do not tend to have many rash, but dry skin is common, and we tell patients to moisturize and be careful with sun [exposure]. Some of the targeted therapies also can cause diarrhea. That’s a common [adverse] effect, and again, it’s good to be proactive, make sure patients are aware, and we can give anti-diarrheal agents.

Reference

Yaeger R. Targeting BRAF, KRAS, and HER2 in GI tumors. Presented at: 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium (CFS); New York, NY. November 12-14, 2025.

Recent Videos
Computational models help researchers anticipate how ADCs may behave in later lines of development, while they are still in the early stages.
ADC payloads with high levels of potency can sometimes lead to higher levels of toxicity, which can eliminate the therapeutic window for patients with cancer.
According to Greg Thurber, PhD, target-mediated uptake is the biggest driver of efficacy for antibody-drug conjugates as a cancer treatment.
Combining daratumumab with other agents is one strategy that investigators are exploring in the smoldering multiple myeloma field.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to expect at the 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium, such as new chemotherapeutics and targeted therapies.
A substantial portion of patients who received daratumumab in the AQUILA study were able to delay disease progression to active multiple myeloma.
Results showed no “deleterious reactions” with chlorotoxin-directed cellular therapy in a small cohort of patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Although 1 of 21 patients with liver-dominant NETs died due to RILD in the phase 1 study, no RILD-induced deaths were observed in the phase 2 trial.
A novel CAR T-cell therapy may bind with more avidity, rather than affinity, to glioblastoma cells, said Michael Barish, PhD.
Related Content