IGHV Mutation Status Does Not Affect CLL Survival Among Ibrutinib-Treated Patients

Article

Unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) status does not adversely impact survival among ibrutinib-treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) status does not adversely impact survival among ibrutinib-treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), according to an integrated analysis of data from three phase III clinical studies (RESONATE, RESONATE-2, and HELIOS), presented (abstract CT158/24) at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2017, held April 1–5 in Washington, DC.

Unmutated-IGHV disease was “an adverse predictor of outcome” for patients who received standard treatment, but not for ibrutinib-treated patients, the authors explained. The findings suggest that ibrutinib does an end-run around IGHV’s role in CLL/SLL.

Patients with unmutated IGHV are already known to fare more poorly under standard-of-care chemotherapy than those harboring IGHV-mutated disease. The authors sought to determine the prognostic implications of unmutated IGHV status for patients who are treated with ibrutinib, which targets Bruton’s tyrosine kinase signaling on B cells.

The authors studied the associations between survival outcomes following ibrutinib administration and IGHV mutation status in 985 CLL/SLL participants in the three studies. They pooled data for analysis from 491 control-group patients (366 with IGHV-unmutated CLL and 125 with IGHV mutations) who did not receive ibrutinib, and 494 patients who received ibrutinib (420 mg/d; 351 with IGHV-unmutated disease and 143 with mutated IGHV).

Control-group patients had received ofatumumab, chlorambucil, and/or bendamustine/rituximab. At baseline, patients with IGHV-unmutated disease were less likely to be treatment-naïve (17% vs 31% of patients) and more likely to have bulky disease (60% vs 37%) or to have del(11q) mutations (32% vs 16%), the authors cautioned. Patient characteristics at baseline were otherwise similar.

At a median follow-up of 21.4 months for ibrutinib-administered patients and 20.6 months for control-group patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar among ibrutinib-treated patients (P = .93 for ibrutinib vs control), regardless of IGHV mutation status (2-year OS: 88% vs 89% for IGHV-unmutated and mutated disease, respectively; P = .86).

However, as expected, in control-group patients, IGHV-unmutated disease was associated with poorer survival than IGHV-mutation-harboring disease, even in multivariate analyses that adjusted for age, sex, baseline ECOG, del(11q) and del(17p) status, prior lines of therapy, and other prognostic variables (2-year OS: 78% vs 87%; adjusted P = .01).

Adverse event (AE) rates and rates of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were similar among patients who received ibrutinib and standard treatment, regardless of IGHV status.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
A new clinical trial aims to offer a novel allogenic CAR T-cell product for patients with lymphoma closer to home.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
Modification of REMS programs may help patients travel back to community practices sooner, according to Suman Kambhampati, MD.
Related Content