Interferon Alpha Nasal Spray Decreases COVID-19 Risk in Those With Cancer

News
Article

Only 2 patients died in the phase 3 trial evaluating interferon-alpha in adult patients with cancer, but were deemed unrelated to study treatment.

rhinitis, medicine and healthcare concept - close up of sick woman using nasal spray | Image Credit Syda Productions-stock.adobe.com

Only 2 patients died in the phase 3 trial evaluating interferon-alpha in adult patients with cancer, but were deemed unrelated to study treatment.

Daily use of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) as a nasal spray was found to reduce the incidence of COVID-19 for adult patients with cancer, according to results from a phase 3 trial (NCT04534725) published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the overall incidence of COVID-19 infection was 11.3% in the IFN-α arm. There was a lower incidence of infection in the IFN-α arm of 8.3% vs 14.4% in the placebo arm (relative risk [RR], .60; 95% credible intervals [CrI], .33-.97). These results showed a 40% reduction in the risk of infection for the IFN-α arm. Additionally, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the IFN-α arm compared with the placebo arm (HR, .55; 95% CI, .32-.97; P = .04).

“IFN-α nasal spray reduced the incidence of COVID-19 and, in particular, in those younger than 65 years and female. It may be that, during the study period, being younger and female was a marker of high risk with working and caring responsibilities and thus higher community exposure to COVID-19. We did not see any differences in the subgroup aged 65 years and older, which is recognized as having a higher risk of progression to severe disease,” Michelle K. Yong, MBBS, FRACP, MPH, PhD, and co-authors of the study wrote in the publication. “Patients receiving IFN-α nasal spray who received a COVID-19 vaccination had a reduced risk of COVID-19 infection by 50%. COVID-19 vaccines were considered standard of care. We did not find any differences in COVID-19 incidence based on cancer type or whether patients were receiving active cancer-related treatment.”

IFN-α was evaluated at a 40,000 IU dose per day because of previously available literature. Patients were given a reformulation of IFN-α-2a/β as a nasal spray and delivered at 20,000 IU/mL per 100 μL actuation. IFN-α was dispensed at either 40,000 IU a day or a normal saline nasal spray.Patients were given a self-testing kit with a nasal swab, viral medium, a prepaid envelope, a symptom diary, and instructions regarding how to perform self-testing when influenza symptoms developed.

Patients were required to have visits at 30, 60, and 90 days, which marked the end of treatment, with the option of study follow-up of 120 and 365 days. During the study, investigators assessed for influenza-like illness symptoms, adherence, and adverse effects (AEs).

The primary end points were incidence of COVID-19 and/or other respiratory viruses within 90 days of randomization.

A total of 433 patients were enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned to either the IFN-α arm (n = 217) or the placebo arm (n = 216). The median patient age in the IFN-α arm was 62 years old, 51% were female, and 91% were White. The primary cancers were hematologic (48%) or solid tumors (52%). The per-protocol analysis included 389 patients.

In the per-protocol cohort, the overall incidence of COVID-19 was 11.8%. In the IFN-α arm, a lower incidence of COVID-19 was observed with 7.7% of patient’s vs 16% in the placebo arm (RR, 0.50; 95% CrI, .26-.84). The incidence of other respiratory events was 4.6% vs 5.7%. Between arm, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the IFN-α arm vs placebo (HR, .46; 95% CI, .26-.82; P = .008).

The trial was stopped early, but a post-hoc analysis showed the trial had a 95.1% power with a 5% alpha error rate to find the true result.

The subgroup analysis showed that those in the IFN-α arm had a decreased risk of infection if they were younger than 65 (RR, .48; 95% CrI, .20-.92), were female (RR, .44; 95% CrI, .19-.85), or had received a COVID-19 vaccine (RR, .50; 95% CrI, .26-.82) compared with the placebo arm. The per-protocol population arm showed a decrease in infection risk for those with solid tumors (RR, .39; 95% CrI, .14-.82), those who were younger than 65 (RR, .36; 95% CrI, .13-.71), those who were female (RR, .36; 95% CrI, .13-.71), and those who had a COVID-19 vaccine (RR, .49; 95% CrI, .25-.83).

Regarding safety, 10.1% of patients in the IFN-α arm had AEs vs 6.0% in the placebo arm (RR, .56; 95% CrI, .16-1.33). Serious AEs were noted in 4.1% vs 2.8% (RR, 1.23; 95% CrI, .36-3.12), while AEs of special interest of grade 2 were observed in 0.5% vs 0.5%, with similar rates for all-cause mortality.

During the study period, one patient in each arm died, but were deemed unrelated to the intervention treatment.

Reference

Yong MK, Thursky K, Crane M, et al. Interferon-α nasal spray prophylaxis reduces COVID-19 in cancer patients: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. Published online August 28, 2025. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf409

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content