JNJ-5322 Shows Efficacy in Later-Line Multiple Myeloma

Commentary
Video

“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath.

In a phase 1 trial (NCT05652335) that evaluated the trispecific antibody JNJ-79635322 (JNJ-5322), the median number of prior lines of therapy was 4. The agent, in patients who were exposed to prior BCMA/GPRC5D-targeted therapy, elicited an overall response rate (ORR) of 55.0% at 50 to 300 mg. In those who were BCMA/GPRC5D naive, the ORR was 100.0% in both patients who received 100 mg once every 4 weeks, the recommended phase 2 dose, and in those who received 300 mg once every 4 weeks.

These results were shared at the European Hematology Association 2025 Congress by Rakesh Popat, MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath. CancerNetwork® spoke with Popat, who stated that all the patients in the trial had triple-class–exposed disease. Despite this, there were fewer patients who had triple-class–exposed and penta-refractory disease compared with initial studies for other agents such as teclistamab-cqyv (Tecvayli), elranatamab-bcmm (Elrexfio), and talquetamab-tgvs (Talvey).

He concluded by emphasizing that, for patients in the fourth or fifth line of therapy, JNJ-5322 is a valid option.

Popat is a consultant hematologist at University College Hospital, leads the Myeloma Clinical Trials Program, and is the program lead for the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Clinical Research Facility.

Transcript:

What’s of note in this study was that these patients did have 4 or more prior lines of therapy, essentially, but they were all triple-class exposed. What we also find is if you drill down into the details, the number of patients who were penta-refractory or triple-class refractory was slightly lower than some of the initial studies with teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquetamab. It is a slightly different population. But nevertheless, what it tells us is that in the relapsed/refractory situation, this drug is highly effective. That is much better compared with some of the conventional treatments that we have. As I said, it does offer some advantages compared with the bispecific [antibodies]. If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, this could be a valid drug of choice.

Reference

Popat R, Touzeau C, Perrot A, et al. First-in-human study of JNJ-79635322 (JNJ-5322), a novel, next-generation trispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: initial phase 1 results. Abstract presented at: European Hematology Association 2025 Congress; June 12-15, 2025; Milan, Italy. Abstract S100.

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Related Content