Joel W. Neal, MD, PhD Discusses the Data on Cabozantinib and Atezolizumab Use in Advanced NSCLC

Video

In terms of tumor control, treatment with cabozantinib and atezolizumab led to an overall response rate of 19% among patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer, according to Joel W. Neal, MD, PhD.

Joel W. Neal, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and associate professor of medicine at Stanford Cancer Institute, sat down with CancerNetwork® during the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting to discuss key data from the phase 1b COSMIC-021 study (NCT03170960), assessing cabozantiniband atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition to noting the encouraging clinical activity of the combination in this patient population, Neal highlighted that patients with an unknown PD-L1 status experienced a slightly higher response rate following treatment.

Transcript:

One interesting thing we looked at was the response rate [for] the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab; 19% of those 81 patients had tumors that responded. [Moreover], 76% of tumors actually had some degree of tumor shrinkage. We saw this as a very encouraging sign of clinical activity from the combination regimen.

Even though we didn't have PD-L1 status on all the tumors that were collected, of the PD-L1–negative tumors, there were lower response rates in the 10% range vs PD-L1–positive tumors. And most interesting to me, the PD-L1 unknown [tumors], the ones that hadn't been tested or [for which] we don't have central tissue to retest, actually had a slightly higher response rate and seemed to have better outcomes. There was some effect by PD-L1. It was interesting because I would have thought that the first-line use of immunotherapy would have minimized any effect from the PD-L1 being high or low.

Reference

Neal JW, Santoro A, Viteri A, et al. Cabozantinib (C) plus atezolizumab (A) or C alone in patients (pts) with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) previously treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI): results from Cohorts 7 and 20 of the COSMIC-021 study. J Clin Oncol 2022;40 (suppl 16):abstr9005. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9005

Recent Videos
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Surgery and radiation chemotherapy can affect immunotherapy’s ability to target tumor cells in the nervous system, according to John Henson, MD.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Related Content