John M. Pagel, MD, PhD, on Polatuzumab Vedotin

Article

The Swedish Cancer Center expert discussed the addition of polatuzumab vedotin to a bendamustine-rituximab regimen at the ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition.

At the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition, held December 7-10 in Orlando, Florida, John M. Pagel, MD, PhD, from the Swedish Cancer Center, discussed the recent approval of polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy) in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (Rituxan; BR) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Transcription:
You know, I think the good news, of course, is that we continue to have very positive outcomes for the vast majority of patients who have large cell lymphoma. Of course, we also have room to go, we need to continue to improve our outcomes.

I think one of the nice things that we have had recently is the addition of polatuzumab to bendamustine-rituximab in the relapsed patient population. We clearly know that it's an active regimen, it's really relatively well tolerated, and I think the biggest benefit that we're gaining from that is using it as a bridge to a more definitive, potentially curative therapy. And in particular, that would be a CAR T-cell treatment or perhaps an autologous transplant. But as you and many other people know, is that when people relapse with their large cell lymphoma, they're often not going to be tremendously responsive to chemotherapy again. Even if it's nominally changed, let's say they got R-CHOP, and if they had a very short remission, or they never had a remission, giving just another regimen like BR may not be particularly helpful.

So, adding another agentpolatuzamab in this examplemakes a lot of sense. And if there's even some synergistic action there, that we can actually get responses that will not lead to a cure but will lead to an opportunity to get that I think. And so it's an important regimen to keep in mind in that regard.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Investigators are currently evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed disease or comparing it with rituximab in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Related Content