Jorge Nieva, MD, Discusses the Impact of IMpower010 and New Trials in Progress for Early-Stage NSCLC

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Jorge Nieva, MD, at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting to talk about the future of clinical trials for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Jorge Nieva, MD, from Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, about how IMpower010 (NCT02486718) made a big impact at this year’s meeting. The trial examined atezolizumab (Tecentriq) and compared it with best supportive care therapy after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected early-stage non–small cell lung cancer. Results from this study indicated that the trial met its primary end point of disease-free survival superiority with atezolizumab (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; 2-sided P = .0205), with overall survival data still immature.

Transcript:

I’m a lung cancer doctor, [and I’m most excited about IMpower010]. I think this will be the biggest splash that comes out [ASCO]. There’s going to be 6 trials in the works asking the same question [of how will adjuvant therapy affect early stage NSCLC]. They’re all going to come out sometime later. I don’t think any of those 6 trials are reporting out at ASCO.

Reference

Wakelee H, Altorki N, Zhou C, et al. IMpower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):8500. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8500

Recent Videos
Delaying treatment with ruxolitinib by more than a year leads to decreased response rates and overall survival in patients with myelofibrosis.
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Related Content