Kathleen Moore, MD, on the Key Takeaways of 3 Clinical Trials Examining Niraparib in BRCA-Mutant Ovarian Cancer

Video

Kathleen Moore, MD, discusses findings compiled from 3 clinical trials of niraparib in patients with ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® sat down with Kathleen Moore, MD, director of the Oklahoma TSET Phase I Program and an associate professor of the Section of Gynecologic Oncology at The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, to discuss key takeaways from 3 clinical trials that examined niraparib (Zejula) in BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer.

The analysis assessed the results of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016), ENGOT-OV16/NOVA (NCT01847274), and NORA (NCT03705156) trials, which examined the use of maintenance niraparib in the frontline and later-line settings of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Transcript:

We are looking at 3 relatively large studies. We are a talking about approximately 1500 women who participated in PRIMA in the frontline, and NOVA and NORA in the [later]-line [setting]. About 1000 patients were treated with niraparib. One of the take-home [messages] is that we do not see any big or meaningful differences in terms of the toxicity profile when you move PARP [inhibitors] to the frontline, as opposed to using [them] as second-line maintenance. That is important. Safety is important in both settings. But it is important because in the frontline, we still do have the potential to cure. Carboplatin alone has an unacceptably low, but present, rate of long-term [median] disease-free survival of 7 to 10 years for advanced stage of cancer.

Reference

Gonzalez Martin A, Matulonis UA, Korach J, et al. Niraparib efficacy and safety in patients with BRCA mutated (BRCAm) ovarian cancer: results from three phase 3 niraparib trials. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):5518. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5518

Recent Videos
ctDNA reductions or clearance also appeared to correlate with a decrease in disease burden during the pre-boost phase of radiotherapy.
Investigators evaluated ctDNA as a potentially noninvasive method to predict response to radiotherapy among those with gynecologic malignancies.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Findings may help providers and patients with head and neck cancer consider whether to proceed with radiotherapy modalities, such as proton therapy or IMRT.
Study results appear to affirm anecdotal information from patients with head and neck cancer related to taste changes during and after radiotherapy.
Noah S. Kalman, MD, MBA, describes the rationale for using a test to measure granular details of taste change in patients undergoing radiotherapy for HNC.
No evidence indicates synergistic toxicity when combining radiation with CAR T-cell therapy in this population, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
The addition of radiotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy may particularly benefit patients with localized disease, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD, discusses how radiation may play a role as bridging therapy to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Related Content