Kathleen Moore, MD, on the Key Takeaways of 3 Clinical Trials Examining Niraparib in BRCA-Mutant Ovarian Cancer

Video

Kathleen Moore, MD, discusses findings compiled from 3 clinical trials of niraparib in patients with ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® sat down with Kathleen Moore, MD, director of the Oklahoma TSET Phase I Program and an associate professor of the Section of Gynecologic Oncology at The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, to discuss key takeaways from 3 clinical trials that examined niraparib (Zejula) in BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer.

The analysis assessed the results of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016), ENGOT-OV16/NOVA (NCT01847274), and NORA (NCT03705156) trials, which examined the use of maintenance niraparib in the frontline and later-line settings of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Transcript:

We are looking at 3 relatively large studies. We are a talking about approximately 1500 women who participated in PRIMA in the frontline, and NOVA and NORA in the [later]-line [setting]. About 1000 patients were treated with niraparib. One of the take-home [messages] is that we do not see any big or meaningful differences in terms of the toxicity profile when you move PARP [inhibitors] to the frontline, as opposed to using [them] as second-line maintenance. That is important. Safety is important in both settings. But it is important because in the frontline, we still do have the potential to cure. Carboplatin alone has an unacceptably low, but present, rate of long-term [median] disease-free survival of 7 to 10 years for advanced stage of cancer.

Reference

Gonzalez Martin A, Matulonis UA, Korach J, et al. Niraparib efficacy and safety in patients with BRCA mutated (BRCAm) ovarian cancer: results from three phase 3 niraparib trials. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):5518. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5518

Recent Videos
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Point-of-care manufacturing, scalable manufacturing, and bringing the cost down [can help].
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Hosts Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss presentations at ESMO 2025 that may impact bladder, kidney, and prostate cancer care.
Mandating additional immunotherapy infusions may help replenish T cells and enhance tumor penetration for solid tumors, including GI malignancies.
Related Content