Kathleen Moore, MD, on the Key Takeaways of 3 Clinical Trials Examining Niraparib in BRCA-Mutant Ovarian Cancer

Video

Kathleen Moore, MD, discusses findings compiled from 3 clinical trials of niraparib in patients with ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® sat down with Kathleen Moore, MD, director of the Oklahoma TSET Phase I Program and an associate professor of the Section of Gynecologic Oncology at The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, to discuss key takeaways from 3 clinical trials that examined niraparib (Zejula) in BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer.

The analysis assessed the results of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016), ENGOT-OV16/NOVA (NCT01847274), and NORA (NCT03705156) trials, which examined the use of maintenance niraparib in the frontline and later-line settings of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Transcript:

We are looking at 3 relatively large studies. We are a talking about approximately 1500 women who participated in PRIMA in the frontline, and NOVA and NORA in the [later]-line [setting]. About 1000 patients were treated with niraparib. One of the take-home [messages] is that we do not see any big or meaningful differences in terms of the toxicity profile when you move PARP [inhibitors] to the frontline, as opposed to using [them] as second-line maintenance. That is important. Safety is important in both settings. But it is important because in the frontline, we still do have the potential to cure. Carboplatin alone has an unacceptably low, but present, rate of long-term [median] disease-free survival of 7 to 10 years for advanced stage of cancer.

Reference

Gonzalez Martin A, Matulonis UA, Korach J, et al. Niraparib efficacy and safety in patients with BRCA mutated (BRCAm) ovarian cancer: results from three phase 3 niraparib trials. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):5518. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5518

Recent Videos
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Related Content